Test scores can measure a person.

Can test scores judge whether students will have a bright future?

Agree: (A debate) First of all, examination results can test a person's knowledge reserve. In the future society, knowledge is power, so these students have high IQ. Moreover, exams can test some abilities, such as psychological quality and perseverance, and other abilities are exercised by participating in some activities, such as adaptability and eloquence. In fact, almost all these activities are taken over by students with good grades, because they have to do more. There is still leisure time to cope with these activities. Therefore, people with good test scores are better than those with poor test scores in almost every ability. Therefore, these students with good test scores are very high. IQ plus EQ is enough to determine a student's future. The examination system has been circulating in China for thousands of years and has always been regarded as a good way to test the ability to select talents. In the past, you had to go to court to become an official. Now, the company's selection personnel have to be written and interviewed. There must be a reason why the exam lasted until today. The exams in the competition questions not only refer to physical fitness tests, but also include personality tests, skill tests and ideological and moral tests. If you get good grades in these exams, you will definitely have a promising future, but if you don't get good grades in the exams, your character and skills may not be so good. Imagine: If you have bad character and skills, how can you have a future? How can I get a good job? Based on the above statement, we believe that exam results can judge students' future prospects.

Counterparty: (a debate) Why are some students defined as idiots? Because you don't study well?

We know that many big entrepreneurs and rich people are actually not smart when they study, or even miss classes halfway. Have you ever wondered why?

For example, Einstein (founder of General Electric), Mr. Bell (inventor of telephone, founder of Bell telephone) and Bill Gates (founder of Microsoft), these great men were actually called idiots by teachers when they were studying. Their success is because they are not afraid of failure and rejection, have their own dreams and beliefs and put them into action. This is the key to success.

On the contrary, those who study well, because they have lived with flowers and applause since childhood, are afraid of failure and frustration, so they choose a road to work for others. It seems safe, but in fact it is full of dangers, because this opportunity does not belong to you, but to others' platform.

Therefore, to succeed, it is not the quality of reading, but to stand up one more time than others in the face of challenges.

Based on the above statement, we believe that examination results can not judge whether students have a bright future.

Counterparty: If all kinds of social tests count as exams? Excuse me, who will grade those exams? If the exam is ok, but the score of the exam, the definition of the exam is very narrow. It is a drawback of the education system to measure students by exam scores. As long as you work hard, all walks of life can win the first prize, and the test results can only show that you have not mastered the theoretical knowledge well enough.

Professor: But we should also look at the reasons. Only with a solid theoretical foundation can we practice well.

Professor: It's time to announce the final exam results. I believe many parents are ecstatic or bereaved about their children's test scores. There is an old saying in human beings, that is, "look at the old at the age of three, and look at the old at the age of seven." According to what? We think it's based on exam results. Whether a child will grow up depends on his current exam results. Examination, a method to test students' learning level, has been handed down through thousands of years of human body tests, and is by far the most scientific method to test students' learning in schools. Therefore, in my opinion, students who do badly in the exam now will never have a future when they grow up. My favorite sentence is "one exam is for life".

On the other hand, it is a tragedy of human beings that "one test determines one's life". When you say "one exam is for life", it is not a student's lifelong achievement, but that he is good at finding a job all his life. It is foolish to pay attention to diplomas when recruiting employees. Now truly visionary entrepreneurs have entered the stage of emphasizing practical ability and neglecting academic qualifications. Zheng once said, "There are more educated people than uneducated people". What is the exam? To put it bluntly, the test is memory. Whoever has a good memory and is good at rote memorization will get high test scores. What's the use of memory today when computers are rampant? In my opinion, the current school is to train students to compete with computers for memory. What is needed for social progress is not memory, but imagination. Can exams test students' imagination? In my opinion, test scores can't measure a student's future prospects at all. It is foolish to judge students' future according to exam scores.

Founder: I want to ask another debater, according to you, human beings have been insisting on unscientific examination methods for thousands of years. Isn't that stupid? And human beings are recognized as the smartest creatures on earth. Since he is the cleverest, he won't do anything stupid. Please answer!

On the contrary: human beings are indeed the smartest on earth, but being smart doesn't mean not doing stupid things. Do you know how fast the earth deserts every year? Isn't this a person? Judging students' future according to test scores is the stupidest of all kinds of stupid things that human beings do.

Professor: Examination results can really tell us whether a student will have a bright future. Don't you need memory in the era of computer rampage? Excuse me, can a person without memory achieve great things? He can't even remember where his home is and which company he works for. How can he benefit society? Memory is the most important quality in a person, and a person without memory will not achieve anything.

Counterparty: We don't think scores are useless, but we can't take scores as the only criterion to measure ability. Examination is a way for the country to select the talents it needs, and it is not suitable for everyone. Just like bonsai can never be cultivated by the standards of roadside trees, people's talents can never be measured by only one standard.

Opposing party: the talent recruited by any employer is first of all personal ability, followed by academic qualifications. No matter how high or low your education is, whether your grades are good or bad, there will always be a probation period at the beginning of your work, during which your ability to work will be tested, so this is the real exam. But judging a person's future with grades is not objective enough and accurate enough! But who can manage this problem that the Ministry of Education can't solve? Therefore, there are "talents" with high scores and low energy;

It is common for some graduates of famous universities to stay at home for two or three years, and it is also a problem to have too high a vision. They are blinded by excellent grades and have too high a self-orientation. On the contrary, people with poor grades have low self-positioning but successful careers.

Achievement is not the standard to measure a person. People with poor grades and poor abilities will have no future, let alone a future.

Pro: (Four Debates) How much you achieved when you were a child means whether you will be successful when you grow up.

If not, I would like to ask: you did badly in the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination. A good university will tell you that you did badly in the exam. Although you did badly in this exam, you will do well in the future. Is it possible? No

If the senior high school entrance examination is a special exam, then if you usually get poor grades, will you play your limit in such an important exam? No, if technical school students are not necessarily inferior to Tsinghua students, then I want to ask: If your child is admitted to Tsinghua, will you go to a technical school?

The popular view of the future is that you can get into a good university and find a good job, which will make you have a bright future.

However, if we say, I think garbage collection is very good and will be very promising, and others can't say anything.

If the test scores can't determine the children's future, then is the test still meaningful? Cancel it. But the Ministry of Education has reformed the examination rules many times. Why? Explain that exam results will affect a student's future.

If you are the boss of the company, do you want an employee with a red light in science or excellent exam results?

Therefore, from the above point of view, I think the exam results are of decisive significance to a student's future.

Counterparty: (Four Arguments) From ancient times to the present, few people with great achievements have won the first place in exams as children.

This is also related to the education system, for example, the current education system is very rigid, and the results can't represent anything. What's the difference between a child who got 100 and a child who got 80? There is basically no difference.

And how does a child who got 100 compare with a child who got 40 or 50 points? In the long run, you may find that the IQ of the latter is much higher than that of the former.

Nowadays, education says that grades should be diluted, and some even suggest that students' academic performance should be judged only by failing, passing, being excellent and being excellent. It is extremely foolish to stare at a bunch of numbers to criticize or admire your children. Although the college entrance examination still uses scores to judge students' "life and death" (that is, whether they can go to college or not).

But just as a technical school student may not be inferior to a Tsinghua student in the future, it is certainly not certain.

We might as well say: test scores can't judge whether students have a future, and test scores have no decisive role in a person's growth and future.

Academic performance does not determine the future development of children, but only reflects one aspect of learning ability, and personality+ability+knowledge+health = contribution+wealth, and personality plays a decisive role! That is, the mentality determines the child's future.