Are there any precautions in the national examination interview?

Hello, Xinjiang Tuhua Customer Service is at your service!

Candidates should pay attention to the following questions after entering the interview:

A, pay attention to dress etiquette, solemn and decent.

The interview of civil servants is different from the selection of variety shows and from attending banquets. Therefore, candidates attending the interview must pay attention to being generous and decent when choosing clothes. Male candidates had better choose suits, especially dark colors, with white shirts, mainly blue and gray ties, and black shoes. Female candidates had better choose a suit that can match their skin color, remove the trinkets on the clothes, and the leather shoes should match the color of the clothes. In addition, male and female candidates must pay attention to their hairstyles and don't make them grotesque. The specific methods can refer to the hairstyles of CCTV and provincial TV news hosts, giving people an elegant feeling.

During the interview, we must pay attention to proper manners. Bow and say hello to the examiner when you enter the door, listen carefully to the examiner's questions, look straight, and communicate with all examiners with the corner of your eye; After each question is answered, end the answer with "Answer Finished"; After answering all the questions, thank the examiner and bow out.

Details determine success or failure. Don't underestimate the details of dress etiquette, sometimes it can determine the result of our interview. In a short interview time of more than ten minutes, the first impression is of unexpected importance, which can never be ignored.

Second, find the right position and answer the questions clearly and to the point.

The interview of civil servants is different from the recruitment interview of general enterprises, and the questions are all set for the positions that candidates will be responsible for. Therefore, candidates must find their own position. We should be soberly aware that we are dealing with specific issues from the standpoint of civil servants, not commentators or other roles. Seriously sum up the rules of answering questions and pay attention to the operability of answers. When answering questions, we should pay attention to using the split point of view to analyze, and the questions can be put out or put away to avoid the embarrassing scene that the examiner can't justify himself when asking questions.

For example, when answering questions about getting along with others, we should pay attention to the combination of principle and flexibility. There is such an examination question, "tian teacher is the office director of a certain unit. A leader asked him to prepare a big meeting. After tian teacher was busy, he hung up the logo and arranged tables, chairs and benches. As a result, the voice was silent during the meeting and was criticized by the leader. How to evaluate tian teacher? " This question, first of all, is to find out what kind of processing ability the examiner should examine you. In fact, this is an open question, and the answer is not unique. But the specific problem is to examine the candidate's ability to handle affairs, and to look at the candidate's ability of organization and coordination by evaluating tian teacher. Therefore, this issue must first affirm Mr. Tian's ability, and secondly point out that Mr. Tian lacks the ability of organization and coordination and cannot make overall arrangements. As the director of the office, he should make a comprehensive consideration and arouse the enthusiasm of all the staff in the office. He doesn't have to do everything himself. As long as the checks are in place, he can ensure foolproof. Therefore, Mr. Tian is not suitable as the director of the office. If he is asked to do some concrete work, he may be able to give full play to his strengths and feel more fulfilled. In addition, how to deal with the disagreement with leaders and colleagues, as long as we grasp the principle of not contradicting each other in public and communicating individually.

When answering some hot and focused questions, we should pay attention to the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the answers. For example, an interview in a certain place in 2004 asked for an evaluation of the "audit storm" incident of the National Audit Office. For this question, it is actually to examine the thinking of candidates when dealing with major issues. So when you answer, you must pay attention to the completeness of the answer. First of all, we must affirm the necessity of this audit storm and its positive role in society. In addition, we must point out that Li Jinhua alone cannot eliminate corruption. Basically it depends on the system. We must strengthen legislation and system construction to fundamentally block the source of corruption. Other problems such as "collusion between officials and businessmen in small coal mines" can be analogized.

When answering some specific questions, we must pay attention to its operability. For example, a question about how to solve the repeated theft, replacement and prohibition of manhole covers in a certain place requires candidates to give a specific measure. We must pay attention to the operability of the measures here. If we only criticize and condemn such a headache for the citizens and the government, we will deviate from Wan Li. So what should be the specific answer? In fact, the most fundamental thing around this issue is the word "benefit". As long as this problem is solved, others will be solved. Therefore, the answer to this question is more operable from the following aspects: first, change the material of manhole cover, replace iron manhole cover with cement manhole cover, and make it unprofitable to steal manhole cover; The second is to intensify the crackdown, strengthen patrols and find them in time. In addition, investigate the whereabouts of stolen goods, increase the punishment of the waste collection station where thieves sell stolen goods, and let the stolen goods lose the market; Third, intensify publicity and education, and formulate and publish severe punishment measures.

Of course, there are many kinds of interview topics, some of which may not be suitable for the examiner himself, but as long as we master these methods, we will certainly do well in the interview and achieve ideal results.

Third, improve psychological quality and fight a well-prepared battle.

We often say that "everything is done in advance, and it will be ruined if it is not planned", and the same is true for interviews. Some candidates have good personal qualities, but they will be nervous when they arrive at the examination room, which will affect the effect and achievement of the interview. This is a psychological loss. In fact, psychological quality can be improved through training.

Before the exam, according to the types of topics interviewed in previous years, design examination questions and ask your familiar leaders or colleagues to be judges. Everything is done according to the formal interview procedure. After such repeated training, I can improve my psychological quality, get clearer thinking in the examination room, and obviously relieve my anxiety and tension before the exam.

As long as we think seriously, pay attention to social hot issues, be familiar with the purpose of the proposer and examiner's investigation, and adjust our psychology, we will be able to be handy in the interview, get the examiner's approval, and get the civil service position that we have been longing for for for for a long time.

For more information, please visit the official website of Xinjiang Tuhua/