How should you respond when the interviewer asks how you are thinking?

The interviewer said that you need to think about it.

The interview is a communication, letting the other party realize your strength, and you also understand whether you like and can do this job. The latter may not be realized by many people. Communication is wonderful. Everyone says that they can communicate well with others. In the interviewer's view, communication is not about letting you echo or talk endlessly, but about understanding the positions of both parties from the dialogue, whether it is support or support. and objections, can discuss the issue in depth. What I am afraid of is that no matter what the other party says, I will always tell my own story. Such a person may have a clear goal, but he is not a good communicator because the other party Nothing he says affects his content, and he doesn't care what others say. For example, during the interview, the interviewer asked several times to explain the work experience that is most similar to the position applied for, but some people still insisted on talking about the first job to the last one. Such people are actually unable to communicate. The interviewer's questions are all kinds of strange, but the purpose is to understand your level and what kind of person you are, and to see whether you can be consistent with the existing team in the process. Any question must be answered on the spot from these two aspects. Don’t worry that you don’t have a good diploma or qualifications, or that your past company was not very good. As long as you inform the interview, the interviewer will know all these things, and he will definitely I fancy something on your resume. Before answering a question, you must first look at the people present. There is always one person who is the protagonist. You must listen carefully and think carefully about his questions. The first type of questions is when the interviewer is confirming your resume and your personality characteristics, usually "your past work experience", "description of a certain project on your resume", "your self-evaluation", "talk about it" "Your shortcomings", "An unforgettable success experience/or failure experience", etc. The main purpose is to look at your expression and Communication skills, on the other hand, also confirm whether the questions that the interviewer is concerned about in the resume are true. After all, he has selected you for the interview through your resume. He must have taken a fancy to some of your past experience and performance. He is confirming these questions. Therefore, when answering, be sure to be consistent with your resume. Don't say that the resume is wrong and written randomly. In fact, the truth of the matter is. . . , take the initiative to speak out and give reasonable reasons for any inconsistencies. Secondly, the answer should be good and related to the job you are applying for, including answers about interests and hobbies. It should also be that you like to solve problems, like to produce beautiful results, etc. Related work For example, if you like to travel and sing, it will not help explain your ability. For example, when applying for a programmer job, self-evaluation and successful experiences should be related to your current job. Prepare a written description of the main experience in advance to help you put it to use on the spot. Very helpful. Today's human resources interviews are like a blind date, asking about personality and hobbies, and a blind date is like an interview, asking about the workplace and salary. Many interview guides focus on questions such as hobbies, personality traits, and interactions with people. In fact, there are no Use it, because at the interview stage, the opinions of human resources are very weak, and the business interviewers are not interested in these because they don’t understand them. Besides, when it comes to questions such as hobbies, advantages and disadvantages, and what should you do if you disagree, no one will If you know the correct answer, you just need to answer it calmly. For example, the most difficult shortcoming to answer is that you said that sometimes you are not careful enough and sometimes you are eager for quick results. This is a shortcoming that everyone has. The interviewer cannot tell the difference. If he wants to ask why not Careful, then you just talk about how you spent sleepless nights at a certain job and did not think carefully about a high-level technical problem and lacked experience. If you explain the problem clearly and clearly, or even make a very high-level mistake, then it becomes You have to express yourself about your abilities. As long as such questions can quickly bring up your carefully prepared success and failure experiences and clearly describe the key to the problem, it is equivalent to giving you a chance to perform.

But also pay attention to the logic

Page 2/6

Reasonability. You worked hard, were important and stood alone in the company in the past, so why do you want to change jobs? If you mentioned For a specific project, you'd better know the details. If you say you are the main developer of a certain project, don't even mention how many modules there are. Also, think about the world of people. When an interviewer answers what his personal goals are, , he said that he would become the company's CTO or deputy general manager in charge of technology within four years. I was surprised at the time, because if he did it, then I, the department manager, would have to give up my position in the first year, and the CTO was also interviewing. At the scene, I think he didn’t like such a competitor very much. The second type of questions are technical questions. Understand your familiarity with the relevant field. Before answering, you must understand that the interviewer knows the answer to every question he asks. He will not ask if he does not understand it, and he also knows different levels of questions. How will people generally answer? You must be honest. Don't take it for granted. Just explain directly if you don't know. Don't expect to be able to answer all the questions. The interviewer's purpose is not to defeat you. He will change the questions until he understands your level. You It’s normal to be unfamiliar with certain skills. It’s definitely not showing off when the interviewer corrects your mistakes. By squeezing a series of questions, you can see your attitude towards unfamiliar problems and adversity, and understand whether it will be easier for you to work in the future. When communicating with you, many people will become anxious after being corrected several times by the interviewer, and even adopt an unfriendly and extremely impatient attitude. Some people are very contemptuous when answering questions, as if all technologies are a piece of cake. The interviewer will think that you are not a humble person and may be difficult to manage at work in the future. A good approach is to listen carefully to his corrections and use discussion to confirm what he thinks you are wrong about. Divergent thinking on technical issues is very fatal, because technical issues have clear right and wrong, and your random associations will not be considered a creative performance. On the contrary, the interviewer will think that you are a person who does not like to learn and only knows Only when you don't understand yourself can you have the motivation to learn. I have seen a system engineer who is applying for a job. When answering what the PS

3/6 page

command is under Linux, he Decisively, this is image processing, and I suspect that the system engineer he understands is the moderator. There is also a developer who refers to the Group By function in SQL as sorting, and seriously tells me that he has used this command for sorting for many years. I am very worried that in the future work, they will also pretend to understand, and I keep defending my ignorance, I don’t know if a clear answer would be better, then there are still people who ask, and I don’t know what to do with all the questions. To be honest, I don’t know what to do. The third type of questions is two-way communication, such as whether you can go on a business trip, whether you can work overtime, what else you need to know about the company, and for work attitude issues, if you don’t have special reasons, such as family needs to take care of your There are restrictions on time at the workplace, so make your own judgment. If you have the capital, just say what he doesn't like to hear. Otherwise, just say it's no problem. If you know anything about the company, don't ask about salary, benefits, etc. before it's time. , first ask about your job responsibilities and content, ask about the judging criteria, and listen carefully during the asking process. Take project development as an example, what is the general composition of the team, such as whether you need to consider the interface, and whether the requirements are from business personnel or yourself. Talk to users about which business fields and technical fields the project involves. When the interviewer answers, use your understanding to repeat it to make sure you understand what he means. The interview is a two-way process. You should also ask these questions in your answer. , to understand whether you like and can do this job well.

In the last step, everyone will come to salary. Try to talk more about salary and less about benefits. Benefits are usually company systems and the possibility of change is very small. The opinion of the salary interviewer is very important. Every interviewer has a salary budget in mind. Ask you When it comes to salary requirements, most of the time I don’t want to discuss salary with you, but I want to know whether your expectations are consistent with what he can pay. It is very important that these numbers match each other. If you can know his budget, then it will be 10~ 20 is very easy. You should be able to guess this number based on industry practices and the size of the company. You can judge the interview situation

Page 4/6

and the interview time. If it is very long and you feel that he is satisfied, then you can increase it appropriately. If you feel that he is not satisfied and you like this job, using a low salary is your last chance to make a comeback. Salary is a double-edged sword, because the higher your requirements, the higher his expectations of you. If you are not qualified for the job quickly in the future, it may be difficult for you to pass the probation period. The salary should be low, then you will be competitive. In the future, you will have low expectations at work. It will be easy for you to get opportunities and achieve results. A master must be perfect. The one thing that a low-skilled person has to offer is his results. A master who pretends to be a low-skilled person can achieve results easily. Preemptive effect. Of course, no one likes low wages. From experience, if what you get is slightly lower than what you have to pay, then your price/performance ratio will be higher, so it will be more stable and your chances of promotion will be greater. However, you may face the possibility that adjustments will be slow in the future. Risks: Salary adjustments in mature businesses or large companies are usually more complex, so try to talk as high as possible. For new businesses or small companies, the salary system is flexible, and it will be more beneficial to adjust after you have achieved results. The following items have nothing to do with interviews: It is difficult for you to marry someone you don’t like for material gain and live a happy life. The same is true for finding a job. Not every failure in an interview is bad news, so during the interview you not only have to show yourself, You should also observe whether this company is suitable for you, such as the interviewer's way of speaking and the values ??they espouse, and whether you can accept these. Everything is a process of gradual growth. It doesn’t matter if you failed in the interview today, but you must know what caused your failure and you have to think about whether your technology is too poor, your industry experience is not good, your communication skills are not good, etc., then you I just summarized how I can improve next time and how I can answer my boss so that he thinks I can do it. If you really can't see through your shortcomings, or don't understand the problem, then ask for a business card at the end of the interview, write an email to thank you, and ask if you can give me some advice if you are not admitted. Most interviewers will be happy to reply to you. . You can truly objectively evaluate yourself in anticipation of future opportunities.