Why do some hiring managers like to ridicule people with low academic qualifications?

Have you ever encountered discrimination in your life? For example, painting heavy makeup is a heavy heart, and getting fat is a lack of self-discipline ... The logic of killing everyone with one stick was thought to be alleviated with the joint efforts of everyone. I didn't expect people who are looking for a job normally now to be discriminated against by this logic. ...

First, "I can't get into the undergraduate course, and my IQ is not good."

A job seeker in Hangzhou took a fancy to the product operation position of a big data company in Hangzhou on the online recruitment platform, so he communicated with the HR of this company.

When talking about academic qualifications, students naturally accepted the result after the other party indicated that their academic qualifications did not meet the company's expectations.

If the word "good" appears on one side of the communication, both sides will generally think that the conversation is over and there is no need to reply.

But the hiring manager must add at this time: "Those who fail the undergraduate course are all IQ problems." If you feel that your academic qualifications do not meet the requirements, make it clear that it is too much to rise to personal attacks. Moreover, this company, saying that it only needs more than two graduates, obviously requires a college degree in its own recruitment position. Is this cheating first and then humiliating?

However, regardless of whether students have a bachelor's degree or not, they will not feel comfortable when they see inconsistent requirements. Moreover, there is no absolute correlation between not being admitted to a university and IQ, and the educational resources obtained in different regions are different. Can developed areas compare with remote mountainous areas?

Not to mention that the admission rate of college entrance examination is different in different regions because of population and other factors: academic qualifications are really important, otherwise there will not be so many people desperately going to good schools.

However, if academic qualifications and IQ are completely equated, those who make such remarks will either enjoy superior educational resources in developed areas or have not been beaten by society. After the incident, CCTV commented on the incident directly in the news broadcast, and the career of the recruitment manager came to a satisfactory end: but even if this incident is solved, we still can't break the workplace dilemma of college students and ordinary job seekers.

Second, "We don't want to have work experience."

A newly graduated college student, if he wants to give himself a buffer period, or misses the school move in the process of picking and choosing, then there is only one way left.

Social recruitment is not as friendly as school recruitment, which means that you need to compete with previous graduates with work experience to win a few jobs. A good job has more wolves and less meat.

The reality is that no matter what achievements you have made in school and how much sponsorship you have won, it can only be regarded as a necessary condition in society. Without experience, everything is in vain.

In the early stage of the interview, after reviewing resumes, many companies often refuse in one sentence: "We don't want work experience."