Huawei case reflects the lack of domestic intellectual property management: Huawei's intellectual property rights.

Shortly before the Huawei case reflected the lack of domestic intellectual property management, the Cisco and Huawei cases once again attracted attention. Huawei official

Submit a defense to Marshall District Court, Texas, USA, denying copying Cisco's Internet operating system software.

Five allegations of patent infringement were also denied, and Cisco was accused of monopolizing the computer network equipment market.

Defame Huawei's corporate image. At this time, this seemingly commercial dispute trade war really started. This case reflects the production in China.

It is the need of the government, enterprises, academia and the media to omit the industrial layout and establish an intellectual property defense system.

* * * With the construction of systems engineering, the whole country should make efforts to make up this lesson. Do the management of domestic enterprises.

Some legal experts face the trap of intellectual property rights, and the first thing that will be hurt is the enterprise. Domestic lawyers generally feel that the deep-rooted concept of "litigation" in the minds of Chinese people is "spending money to eliminate disasters"-it is completely an afterthought, isn't it?

There is a concept of prevention. This often brings hidden dangers to enterprises. Lawyer Zhong Qing pointed out sharply that many domestic enterprises

Managers are not unable to foresee risks, but are lucky, and the corporate governance structure and management process are far from reaching the country.

Internationalization level employs legal experts as the top management of the company to be responsible for legal affairs in the company's economic behavior. In foreign enterprises,

Very common in the industry. In China, there are no legal experts in the core leadership of enterprises. So they can't do this every day.

Predict the legal risks in investment, technology research and development and product promotion at the initial stage of operation. In this case where Huawei was sued,

Cisco's spokesman is the vice president in charge of legal affairs. In the investigation, it is found that domestic enterprises have legal departments.

Only a few doors. In recent years, in addition to sales, technology and financial talents, foreign-funded enterprises have also appeared in domestic recruitment.

The position of contract administrator. Their duty is to review, maintain and manage contracts from a legal perspective. If you find it, just ask.

Issue an early warning to relevant operators in time. Moreover, domestic enterprises generally lack the awareness of long-term development, pay attention to

Focus on short-term interests. I would rather spend millions on advertising than spend a penny to ask legal experts to sit down and help enterprises.

Understand the details of intellectual property rights. There are also traps behind the "standard", such as mobile communication, camera shooting, video recording,

There are basically no traditional technologies in new economic fields such as DVD, Internet and bank credit cards. In these industries, China.

Generally, there is no own technical standard, and most of them are imported from international standards. "I started to pay attention to standards and knowledge production in 1999.

Yes, but at that time, few people in China studied it specially, so few people paid attention to the seriousness of the problem.

We feel very' terrible' after studying it. Zhang Ping, an associate professor of Peking University who is good at rational language, said emotionally. Zhang pingjiao

During the research, the professor found that China was studying ISO, International Electrician, Digital TV Alliance of the European Union, MTV and DVD of the United States.

Standard, with the content of discovering intellectual property rights. However, when translating these standard terms, related patents and other knowledge will be generated.

The question of power was ignored. This shows that at that time, as a small country with intellectual property rights, we did not understand the relationship between standards and intellectual property rights

I thought the standard could be used for free when it was made public, but I didn't notice that patents in the standard also had to be paid.

China enterprises encountered such a difficult problem in the DVD incident. Several international companies have formed a strong alliance on DVD.

Monopoly, but China has no anti-monopoly law to deal with it. The United States promulgated the Anti-Monopoly Law as early as 1995, and these enterprises were early.

These laws can be easily bypassed, and their joint statements issued around the world are also valid. Therefore, China enterprises are only "good"

Pay the money well. "1in the 1990s, international organizations closely related to large international enterprises were revising their own standards.

At that time, our country did not realize the seriousness of the problem and did not publicize it in the domestic business community in time, which led to many hidden dangers.

[! Imperial news. Page-] Professor Zhang Ping also reminded that the China government should also vigorously promote the upgrading of domestic enterprises.

Legal tools and agreements dealing with international intellectual property rights. "The government has an obligation to tell the public about the seriousness of intellectual property issues, but our government has done a little bit in this regard. For example, after China joined the World Trade Organization, it was widely publicized.

We know how to protect property rights, and let the people all over the country know how to protect the rights of others, but as a small country, we have this right, but we have forgotten it.

In order to tell our people, there is also an agreement on technical barriers to trade in the package we signed when we joined the World Trade Organization. this

The agreement allows us to create a market access door through technical standards, technical regulations, packaging, decoration and product certification.

Threshold, in order to eliminate technical barriers to trade caused by other countries. "To avoid the" mines "of industrial layout, China engineers can't sign their own new technologies, let alone apply for patents! Such a strange thing is happening to me

It is being staged in many fields in China. The chief engineers of two large enterprises cooperating with Boeing Company of the United States reported to Zhang Ping that they and Boeing Company

Among all the products completed by the company, Chinese personnel put forward many advanced suggestions and schemes, but only American engineers have the right to sign them.

Character recognition, and many of these schemes can be patented by China people, but now they not only have no right to apply.

Please, I don't even have the right to make suggestions, "because that's how the contract was signed!" " "In the technology market, or

When the market gains the interests of other countries, there are also such shocking facts. The contract signed between Qualcomm and China put this country

Many domestic manufacturers are excluded, and the idea of revitalizing the manufacturing industry that our government hopes may come to nothing. Zhang Ping told reporters: "The contract that Qualcomm gave us at that time was extremely unfair, but because we signed it in a package, like ZTE,

Huawei, Datang and other manufacturers simply have no room for negotiation, because the above agreements have been covered. Ask the following questions.

The problem can only be minor repairs. But in terms of intellectual property rights, Qualcomm has given very harsh terms. "These facts show that

The industrial layout ability of some domestic management departments is not good. The development of any emerging industry should be technical and legal construction.

Multi-problem system design engineering should at least have such consciousness. As the old saying goes, it should be "learning from mistakes". The media and academic circles are duty-bound. Zhang Ping concluded that the domestic media and the legal profession are duty-bound on the issue of intellectual property rights.

When dealing with intellectual property cases, mortgage media should guide the society, rather than temporarily stop guessing with national sentiment.

Think about countermeasures and guide the business community to pay long-term attention to intellectual property issues. In addition, she believes that the legal profession should bend down and do it.

Do something practical. "I think there are not enough research reports in domestic law and intellectual property circles at present. In foreign legal circles, every policy and law has data support and practical analysis. However, in the legal circle of China, practical analysis is not emphasized.

Just pay attention to theoretical analysis. Because if you do actual combat analysis, the professor can't produce results and can't evaluate the title! But without this,

This kind of analysis will affect the decision-making and policy-making of our government officials, who are not confident to speak out. In-depth comments on "Only the tip of the iceberg" Huawei is the pioneer. It started as a telecom equipment manufacturer in 1988.

In recent years, the company has made great progress in the field of network equipment. In 2002, its sales reached 22 billion yuan, and it is considered as the richest private high-tech enterprise in China. Because of its outstanding performance, Huawei also started at the beginning of this year.

It has become the "Depth Charge" of litigation-it has become the cause of "panic" of foreign enterprises, and tried to curb its growth through legal means.

One of the first enterprises in China, at the same time, it also triggered the deep thinking of domestic enterprises about building a system with independent intellectual property rights.

[! Imperial news. Page-] In fact, the crisis has been lurking under the iceberg. It should be noted that Cisco's lawsuit is by no means

On impulse, I should pay attention to Huawei for some time. They kept it a secret because they thought it was in China.

Enterprises are too weak to pose a threat in the international market. Another reason is that they don't want to spend too much energy.

The cooperative relationship with the government of China broke down due to a lawsuit. But things are obviously different now, Hua

In order to become the main supplier of China telecom market not only in China, but also in the United States. Facing the imminent competition

In the end, Cisco chose to sue, but at the same time it wisely defended its "position". Before the lawsuit is played, you first claim that it is "very high"

I am glad to see that the China government will fully protect the intellectual property rights of western enterprises. There is a saying that "the wood in the forest is beautiful, and the wind will destroy it."

Domestic equipment suppliers and software manufacturers are worried that the intellectual property disputes of domestic enterprises entering the international market have just begun.

At first, there may be more obstacles in the future. In recent two years, China enterprises have been praised by foreign companies for their core technologies.

Verb (the abbreviation of verb) VIA has been suppressed by Intel one after another, and domestic DVD manufacturers are subject to people because of the lack of core technology.

Brew bitter fruit. If this game is compared to a ball game, it seems that China is playing away from home because it has lost control.

Take the initiative to make rules to follow other people's rules, otherwise it is likely to be highlighted by the referee. Not alarmist, Hua.

This case is just the tip of the iceberg. The appeal of "attaching importance to the research and development of technologies and products with independent intellectual property rights" should be strengthened.

While domestic enterprises are developing rapidly, they should also spend more time and money on basic work.