8 types of people who talk in interviews can also be annoying

8 types of people who can talk well in interviews can also be annoying

There are 8 types of people who can talk well in interviews and can also be annoying. There are also some principles of life in the workplace. There are no permanent friends and enemies in the workplace. Character is revealed in the details. You must be brave enough to admit mistakes in the workplace. The 8 kinds of people who can talk during interviews can also be annoying. Those things in the workplace.

8 types of people who talk well during interviews can also be annoying 1

"Me-centered" rhetoric

Questions about your own experience and abilities during the interview The expression should be concise and to the point, and should be stopped in moderation. Don't talk endlessly like a chatterbox, brag about yourself, or even "put me first" indiscriminately. Job seekers should be practical and concise, and should not make too many verbal promises. Talking too much can easily arouse the examiner's resentment. The examiner often asks you to demonstrate your talent on the spot. You can give it a try modestly, but don't wait until you start, claiming that this is no problem and that is easy. If you seem to be boasting, you must be careful in job interviews.

Yes, the interviewer in charge of recruitment pays great attention to the assessment of your ability, but he will be more cautious towards you during the interview, aiming to allow you to fully demonstrate yourself. At this time, if you want to talk to the examiner, ramble on, talk about irrelevant topics, or even brag about your "network of connections" and feel complacent, for fear that others will not know how much energy you have, then you should The examiner will definitely think that you are a person who can only pull the big flag and make tiger skins. You are extremely shallow and your ability is "no more than that".

In the final analysis, rhetoric is to avoid the essence of the problem, so it uses dishonest and frank flattery to cover up oneself. For example, job seekers are often asked by examiners why they lost their past jobs. In order to avoid the topic, some people deliberately talk about their ideals and ambitions or what they have learned from past jobs. If they really can't pass the test, He was very bitter about his past workplace. The implication was that the temple of his old workplace was too small to accommodate a great monk like him. Faced with such a bombastic interviewer, the examiner will most likely have this reaction in his heart: Who do you think you are? This temple has no need for a flashy "big monk" like you.

Can’t wait to talk or argue

In order to win the favor of the examiner, some job seekers will try to "conquer" the other party through a language "offensive". This kind of person has a strong desire for self-expression. During the interview, he doesn't care whether the examiner buys his account or not. He can't wait to open up the "battlefield" without saying more than three or two sentences, show off his eloquence, and strive to be "fluent in language". "Opportunities" to gain the upper hand and conquer the opponent in matters of affairs. The main manifestations are in grabbing words, interrupting, arguing, etc.

It cannot be said that those who love to grab words or interrupt are shallow people, but people often hate this kind of "no talking" phenomenon. Therefore, during a job interview, no matter how outstanding your own opinions are, no matter how biased other people's views or opinions are on you, you must not interrupt before the other person has finished speaking. This is also the most basic respect for the examiner. . Even if the examiner's words are too biased, it means that the examiner has already held a prejudice against you. At this time, no matter how much you interrupt or grab the conversation, it will not help. It will only increase people's dislike of you.

The "move" of interjecting and grabbing the conversation is nothing more than arguing or arguing. But if the interview conversation turns into an argument or argument, can such an interview still be called an interview? One job seeker kept using an argumentative and rebuttal tone during the conversation: "Why not!" "I have my opinion, no matter what you do "Think." This kind of argument may show your intelligence, cleverness, reasoning ability and persuasion ability. You may have regained face in a certain detail, but you don't know that just when you are "satisfied", the examiner will Considering the overall situation, and for the sake of the future peace of the company, I have given up on your employment.

Winning an argument and losing a good job is a big deal. The goal of an interview is not to win the conversation or to hold a debate, but to get the job.

If you are too "serious" with the examiner during the conversation, which makes the examiner very troubled by you and thinks that you "are not looking for a job at all, but deliberately looking for trouble", you can imagine that things will turn out badly. How disastrous the result will be!

Sluggish response at critical moments

Silence is golden? Sorry, in a job interview, don’t be misled by this kind of over-the-top preaching. When the examiner asks some very critical questions, if you also "spare words like gold", then why are you going to interview? The examiner will definitely think that you are dull and slow to respond. If you leave this impression on the examiner, then it can be said that your job search mission will fail, because no company is willing to hire someone who is slow to respond.

"Speak less" is necessary. But what is more necessary than "talk less" is to "speak carefully" rather than "not to speak"! But "not to speak" during an interview is of course dull and slow. Although the contrast between dull and slow people and those who talk too much is obvious, it is also impossible to become a good and competent employee. The purpose of a job interview is to let the employer evaluate you. If you shyly don't open your mouth to speak, how can they evaluate you?

Interview conversations must not only use your mind, but also your heart. When you stood with both feet in front of the examiner and looked at the other person's arrogant posture, you lowered your eyelids inexplicably, feeling ashamed, and the questions and answers you had designed for yourself earlier were completely gone. The more this happens, the more panicked you become, causing you to speak incoherently and incoherently. These are all signs of slow response.

Most people who are slow to respond are prone to inferiority complex. The more inferior they are, the slower they become. This is called a vicious cycle. Once a person has low self-esteem and is slow, he will not dare to look the examiner in the eye, and will become passive, indifferent, and bored, which are enough to destroy the examiner's enthusiasm and confidence in you.

Shamelessly good at teaching others

Job hunting is job hunting, and job hunting is different from being employed. It is not false at all that the employed person should have an attitude of ownership, but when applying for a job, your status is not yet that of the owner. Even if you feel that you are full of good ideas, this will never be enough to impress the examiner.

Not everyone has new ideas. People who have good ideas and new ideas cannot always be teachers, especially "pointers" to strangers. The so-called new ideas contain more or less advice, and most of the advice is criticism. Criticism is difficult for someone to accept, especially criticism from strangers. It is impossible to be appreciated, followed, and even less likely to be appreciated. Create a good impression. This is a reason to give less advice. You are a job seeker. If you express your thoughts and suggestions in front of the examiner, and you are not rejected, then it proves that the examiner is too opinionated.

In the eyes of the examiner, asking job seekers to talk about their ideas and make suggestions is a "double-edged sword". On the one hand, it examines your thinking, and at the same time, it also digs a trap for you. It will immediately It turns you into a guy who is "good at teaching others" and "good at talking". Therefore, in the interview, it is most taboo to give advice with advice. No matter how pertinent and excellent your suggestions are, it’s best to save them until after you’re hired and don’t rush to show off when applying for a job.

Ask low-level questions

A job interview is not an admissions interview. What the examiner wants to examine is your overall quality. At the same time, you can also ask some questions related to the major you studied, or ask questions about the company's work system and other issues. But before asking, you must think carefully about whether the question you are about to ask has practical significance, especially do not ask low-level or even naive questions. For example, does the unit have 24-hour hot water supply? Is there a bathroom in the office? Does the unit usually organize travel for everyone? These may ruin a good interview.

Arrogant

This is the most common problem for people who are arrogant and talkative. I have to admit that this kind of person may have some capital that is superior to others, but this capital is likely to appear "lightweight" because of your arrogance. The ancients said that "thick accumulation makes little progress" and "hiding it deeply is not revealed". This is the true accumulation of capability capital. No matter how much capital you have, you are still in a subordinate position when applying for a job. Talking about how rich your experience is in front of the examiner just shows that you lack education and don't take others seriously, and you dare to offend anyone. Most of the job seekers who are arrogant have an inexplicable desire to control and want to suppress others in order to show their advantages.

As everyone knows, if you go to an interview with this mentality, the examiner has the power to kill the students. If you let him listen respectfully to your "pointing out the country", won't the fire of ignorance in his heart huff and puff? If you pissed off the examiner, why are you doing the interview? !

Abuse of fashion words

It is not a bad thing for young people to pursue fashion, but fashion reflects a person's rebellion against reality from a certain perspective. Some young people have relatively average knowledge and ability, but they are very fascinated by fashion. They always like to use fashionable terms in their daily conversations. As a result, during job interviews, they are as careless as "blowing bubbles online" and frequently use very fashionable Internet fashion terms. "Talk about topics" with the examiner, thinking that doing so can not only make up for your lack of knowledge and ability, but also make the examiner think that you are "avant-garde" and very pleasant, so you will be hired. As everyone knows, most people who dare to be examiners are not fuel-efficient lamps. How can your frivolous language block his sharp insight?

In addition, some people learn foreign languages ??with half a bucket of water. During the interview, I like to mix in one or two from time to time to show off my abilities, but it is very dangerous to show off like this: if the examiner immediately starts talking to you in English, wouldn’t you just shoot yourself in the face? Feet?

Pour out your grievances regardless of the target

Job hunting is not a grievance meeting, let alone a relief meeting. Some job seekers do not position themselves correctly during the interview. When asked, they use the opportunity to express their bitterness when answering, saying that they have experienced such misfortunes and cannot bear the heavy burden of family, thinking that this can attract the attention of the employer. The examiner's sympathy, but everyone knows that not only will this not get sympathy from others, but it will also turn people off! Everyone has bad luck sometimes. Some people have poor psychological endurance. They sigh and lament when something bad happens to them, complain about the unfairness of the world all day long, and appear to be bitter and resentful. You may be able to gain sympathy from others by doing this, but if you apply this technique wishfully to a job interview, you will definitely fail miserably. Of course, the examiner also has sympathy, but a competent examiner will never abuse this sympathy. Whenever someone complains during the interview, the examiner will usually nod without saying a word and seem to be listening to you patiently. When you finish complaining, the examiner will tell you with enthusiasm at best: Please Go back and wait for notification. This "waiting" may be in what year or month? 8 types of people who can talk well during interviews can also be annoying 2

Don't let interview taboos derail your future

Maybe Your grades are among the top three in your grade. Maybe your comprehensive evaluation is very good. However, you may still be like many fresh college graduates who were eliminated in an interview that lasted less than an hour because you didn't understand the interview skills. In order for you to successfully pass the interviewer's assessment, we invited Michael, an employment consultant from the campus recruitment website, to summarize the taboos during the interview.

Avoid stage fright. The day before the interview, rehearse with your friends, prepare answers to frequently asked questions, and let your friends give their opinions. One hour before the interview, review your resume, especially awards and other items. Half an hour before the interview, take a deep breath and remind yourself that you have overcome the biggest hurdles in the past, and you will go through more interviews when looking for a job in the future. Five minutes before the interview, try to memorize 300 Tang poems or Lincoln's Gettysburg Address to relax your emotions and prepare for the intense battle.

Avoid being "outspoken and quick-hearted" If you rush to answer every time the examiner finishes asking a question, you will appear unsteady. Of course, if you have to think about every problem over and over again, you will appear to be overly cautious and timid. The correct approach is: you can answer most questions immediately as soon as they are asked, and think about how to finish while answering. For other more difficult or unexpected questions, you can confirm the question with the other party. A more appropriate way is to ask "Do you mean..." and play back the question in your own way of understanding, which can not only reflect your Being serious can also buy you time to think.

Don’t ignore the rules. Interviews are highly stylized activities and have their own rules of the game. Points will be deducted for any non-compliance with the rules such as not arriving at the agreed interview time, not attending the interview in the required attire. The most important rule of the game is honesty. Don't take any chances, HR has countless people to read, and any cover-up you make will not escape their eyes. Regardless of ability, companies should first recruit honest people. Any dishonesty will be rejected with one vote. Only the true self can bring real success.

In addition to interviews, you should also truthfully record your experience in your resume, so that when HR searches for students at this step, it can judge the match between students and positions through real experiences and provide suitable opportunities to students.