Brief introduction of college entrance examination students.

According to relevant sources, art majors apply for higher art colleges, majoring in music, art and dance. Art majors apply for undergraduate colleges, and their majors are general majors, such as architecture, communication and Chinese. Ordinary colleges and universities will generally give priority to candidates who have reached the minimum control line and have artistic expertise. Candidates majoring in art who apply for art colleges can still apply for art specialty students in ordinary colleges and universities.

For senior three students, in addition to following the rules and entering the halls of colleges and universities through the "single-plank bridge" of the college entrance examination, there is now another way to enter the university through independent enrollment as a "special student". I don't object to the enrollment system of "special students" in colleges and universities, because those students who are outstanding in some aspects but have weak cultural knowledge should be given an opportunity to receive higher education. But I am puzzled that the scope of this "gifted student" is limited to art and sports. Is it true that only those who can sing and dance well and run well are considered gifted students, while wizards in other fields (such as literature and science and technology) cannot enjoy the qualification of gifted students? Are art and sports more related to the national economy and people's livelihood? Or is it because such talents are too scarce and need to be trained by key universities?

In fact, everyone with discerning eyes knows that most colleges and universities with the qualification of "special students" are key universities, and many of them do not have physical education departments or art departments. Most of them admit such "special students" not to cultivate these talents, but to "use them for my own use" and add luster to these schools with their "talent show".

A friend's daughter was admitted to a famous university in Beijing with a score of "Ibn" in the college entrance examination. The reason is that she plays the cello very well, and there is a lack of such musicians in the orchestra of that university. A student I taught, with average academic performance, was admitted to a famous university in the provincial capital just after winning the second place in the provincial youth table tennis competition, and was even recruited to prepare for the summer college table tennis league without waiting for school to start. Needless to say, the above two examples are enough to illustrate the motivation of college sports art "special students" enrollment. This kind of enrollment seems to me less like enrollment, more like "recruitment" and "recruitment". Recruit a shortage of musicians for the school band and select a high-level athlete for the school sports team. This is not "recruitment" or "recruitment". What is it?

If some students are willing to continue to develop their own artistic and sports specialties, or take one of them as their career development direction, then it is best to study in a professional school; If this specialty is just a hobby, it should not be a reason for demotion or even exemption from the exam. This is like Einstein playing the violin well, which can be given priority in the music department, but it can't be a preferential condition in the physics department, otherwise it will be unfair to the students studying in the physics department. Liu Xiang's study in the Department of Physical Education of East China Normal University has no criticism, while Ding Junhui's study in Shanghai Jiaotong University has caused an uproar in the public opinion circle. The reason is actually the same.

Sports and art "special students" have become hot commodities in the enrollment market, while some literature "special students" and science and technology "special students" have no interest in schools? The reason is probably that the "special students" of art and sports are more likely to slap the face of the school and get a sensational effect for the alma mater. And the so-called professional choice with such a narrow enrollment is unfair to candidates with majors in other fields?

If the university is good, candidates must be very careful. Have you found that there are so many art and sports interest classes that specialize in recruiting students from primary and secondary schools and even kindergartens, which are sweeping across the country? How many are really designed for interest? Isn't it just to earn a poor extra point in the Japanese college entrance examination? The study of cultural knowledge makes students all over the world "work hard", and the development of "specialty" means that all people "live" (students) and "work hard"! What is the significance of such "special student enrollment" in guiding students' development and cultivating high-level talents?