Digging each other up inside the company.

Digging each other up inside the company.

It is common for companies to poach people from each other, but it is not common in companies. What impact will this bring to the company? Let me introduce some situations of mutual poaching within the company. I hope you can have a look.

Digging people from each other within the company 1

This high-level "conspiracy" was first exposed because in 20 1 1 year, five software engineers filed civil lawsuits against companies such as Apple and Google. The five engineers filed a lawsuit, claiming that several major industry giants, including Apple, Google and Intel, had secretly reached an agreement of "no poaching" since the beginning of the 20th century, thus artificially suppressing the increase of employees' salary.

According to the historical emails disclosed by the court at that time, as the most innovative and powerful CEO in Silicon Valley, Jobs was the initiator of this "conspiracy". As early as 2005, Google co-founder sergey brin tried to hire a browser team from Apple.

Jobs immediately warned that if Brin hired any of these people, it would mean that Google was declaring war on Apple. Then, the two companies reached an informal agreement and agreed not to hire each other's employees.

In 2007, the deterrent effect of this agreement became more and more severe. When Google's human resources specialist accidentally contacted Apple engineers, Jobs immediately protested to Google executives. To appease him, Google fired the hapless HR Commissioner within an hour. In the following years, such transactions began to circulate secretly among other big companies in Silicon Valley.

For example, Schmidt, former CEO of Google, revealed in an email that meg whitman, then CEO of Yi Bei, had called and told herself that "Google's recruitment strategy hurt Yi Bei". After that, Schmidt quickly fired the recruiter who had contacted Yi Bei COO.

According to a survey conducted by the US Department of Justice in 2009, at least Adobe, Intuit, Intel and Pixar participated in the "no poaching" agreement.

For all the companies involved, this is undoubtedly a transaction hidden in the sleeve. Schmidt said that he would prefer this to be an oral agreement, so as not to leave evidence of prosecution. When paul otellini, CEO of Intel, was asked about it, he also admitted: "We didn't sign any documents with Google, and I don't like it to become a well-known thing, but we did have a handshake agreement." .

According to statistics, more than 64,000 software engineers, designers and programmers have suffered millions of dollars in losses. Others think that Jobs, who likes to keep people's appetite before the product is released, cares more about confidentiality than about salary constraints.

Professor Allen Hyde, who studies economic and legal issues in Silicon Valley, commented that this kind of transaction completely violates the secrets of success in Silicon Valley. In fact, "job-hopping" is only an important driving force to maintain the vitality of Silicon Valley. A large number of studies show that high-tech companies, especially those in California, use the unique short-term system to strengthen the contact with former employees, which greatly promotes the information exchange within the industry, thus accelerating the efficiency of innovation.

So, someone said "no" to Jobs. When Palm tried to hire the core executives of the iPod team, Jobs sold his secret agreement to the CEO of Palm as usual, but it was rejected.

Digging people from each other within the company II. In any new industry that is emerging or erupting, the phenomenon of poaching will be very serious, because everyone is desperately occupying the site, and time is more important than money, which will lead to the prevalence of quick success and instant benefit in this industry, because poachers often pay attention not to the personal ability of the target, but to personal experience, hoping to save time and cost and reduce the loss and time of trial and error of poachers.

If the mobility of talents between industries is too strong, it will lead to impetuous people in the industry. Just say that he will change jobs in any company for a long time. If he gets used to it, he has no loyalty. As long as you give me more money, I am willing to work for you, which of course increases the mobility of talents and improves the value of talents. However, it is also a problem for companies to recruit or train talents, because companies are not sure whether the talents they train can get higher wages one day.

First of all, you have to confirm why the other party wants you to go, because of your ability or your interpersonal relationship. If it's interpersonal relationships, you can't go. If you don't engage in politics in your post and leave your present post, those relationships will be invalid. If you want to go to another department because of your ability, you must first get the consent of the boss here, otherwise it will be difficult to do things in the future by forcibly offending people here.