What are the advantages and disadvantages of omnipotence and expert debate?

Expertise advantage: the division of social knowledge and skills can greatly improve the input-output ratio of learning and adapt to the established post division of labor.

All-round advantages: we can evaluate and coordinate labor distribution in a wider range.

Everyone needs a generalist, but the large number of professionals means that as a generalist, you face greater challenges because you have fewer opportunities.

All-rounders and professionals have played a vital role in social development.

I don't know which one I need more.

Because professionals can be seen everywhere, reused and successful examples abound, the threshold for becoming a professional is lower than that of a generalist. As the saying goes, specializing in one thing is really easy to become a talent, so it gives people the feeling that society needs professionals more.

In fact, whether it is an enterprise or a country, many important decisions need a generalist to weigh the pros and cons, because they have a broad vision.

Generalists and professionals are mutually transformed under certain conditions. For example, a computer major is proficient in hardware, but he also becomes a computer hardware expert on the basis of having a certain generalist in mathematics, physics, language and other disciplines. In his future development, if he wants to make achievements, he needs to supplement his professional knowledge in software and electronics and become a generalist again.

Therefore, from the perspective of social needs, it should be equally important, but there will be certain differences in different periods. For example, since the reform and opening up, China has been short of professionals, that is, professionals.