Is it necessary to pay compensation for suing the whole building?

Specific analysis of specific problems, whether the whole building needs compensation depends on whether the residents of the whole building are at fault in resisting the second floor. If they are at fault, they need compensation. If they can prove that they are not at fault, they don't need compensation.

2. If the pipeline design is the cause of the reverse flow on the second floor, the responsibility shall be borne by the property management company. If the property management party refuses to pay compensation, it can take photos to register the loss and find a professional appraisal agency to identify the loss.

Legal analysis: Whether the whole building needs compensation depends on whether the residents of the whole building are at fault on the second floor. If they are at fault, they need compensation. If they can prove that they are not at fault, they don't need compensation.

2. If the pipeline design is the cause of the reverse flow on the second floor, the responsibility shall be borne by the property company. If the property owner refuses to pay compensation, he can take photos to register the loss and find a professional appraisal agency to identify the loss. According to the laws of our country, it is necessary to analyze the specific situation to sue the whole building on the second floor for anti-water. If there is a fault, you need compensation. Generally, the owners of the whole building share the responsibility. If the sewer is improperly designed, leading to anti-water, then the responsibility shall be borne by the property company.

If a lawsuit is filed against the whole building on the second floor, it is necessary to decide whether to bear the liability for compensation according to the reasons leading to the defection. If the defector is at fault, the residents of the whole building shall be jointly and severally liable for compensation unless they prove that they are not at fault. If it is caused by the plaintiff's own reasons, no compensation is needed. If it is caused by construction, the construction unit shall bear the liability for compensation, and either party shall bear the burden of proof for its own claims.

1. If this situation is caused by the blockage of your own sewer pipe and the loss downstairs is caused by backflow, then this responsibility should be borne by you; If the sewer pipe is blocked from the first floor, but you don't know that the loss downstairs is caused by the water pouring from your sewer pipe, then this loss should be solved by you, the first floor and the property (there is a favorable condition for you, how can you prove that the sewage overflowing from your sewer pipe crossing is discharged by you? If you can't prove it, then you are not responsible. The first floor can investigate all tenants from you to the upstairs, but you can't just investigate yourself. If the property has known about the pipeline blockage before and has not solved it, then the responsibility will be borne by the property.

2. There is another situation. If you live on the second floor, your sewer pipe is separated from the first floor. Even if the blockage is not caused by you on purpose, the responsibility will still be borne by you, regardless of whether you have communicated with the property in advance about maintenance.

Legal basis: Article 295 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Real estate owners are not allowed to dig holes to borrow soil, build buildings, lay pipelines and install equipment, endangering the safety of adjacent real estate.

Article 296

The property owner uses the adjacent property for water use, drainage, traffic, pipeline laying, etc. We should try our best to avoid causing damage to neighboring real estate owners.

Article 165

If the actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others due to his fault, he shall bear the tort liability.

If the actor is presumed to be at fault according to the law and cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.

Article 7 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC)

In trying civil cases, the people's courts must be based on facts and take the law as the criterion.

Article 64

The parties have the responsibility to provide evidence for their claims. The people's court shall investigate and collect evidence that the parties and their agents ad litem cannot collect on their own due to objective reasons, or evidence that the people's court considers necessary for hearing a case. The people's court shall comprehensively and objectively examine and verify the evidence in accordance with legal procedures.