In Microsoft's Windows operating system and Office suite, the problems of "Qin" and "Tan"

Affectionate Microsoft is infinitely cheap! How painful is it to be blindsided by China?

Recently, when people use computers, the system will prompt you whether Microsoft products are pirated software, and will there be a little blue star in the lower right corner? This is because the United States recently filed an appeal against intellectual property protection in China, and Microsoft is collecting relevant evidence for the United States government, including the program for detecting piracy in the recent automatic update. For the benefit of China, please do not turn on automatic update. If successful, China will pay tens of billions of compensation, which has already started. Please do not install genuine value-added plan when prompted! After installation, a blue five-pointed star symbol will appear in the lower right corner of the taskbar, which will be tracked and locked by Microsoft to provide evidence to the US government.

1998, Bill, the richest man in the world and president of Microsoft? In an interview with Fortune magazine, Gates said: "Some people like to steal software for free, but as long as they want to steal, we hope they will steal ours. Because they are addicted, we will study how to collect money from them in the next decade. "

In 2003, Microsoft began to attack Internet cafes. For example, the copyright department of Zhenjiang City has received a complaint from Microsoft about the installation and use of pirated Windows operating system in hundreds of Internet cafes in Zhenjiang. The local copyright bureau that received the complaint from Microsoft asked local Internet cafes to use genuine Microsoft software immediately, or they will face huge penalties. In 2005, there were more than 3.5 million computers in regular Internet cafes and more than 49.5 million personal computers for home users. According to the survey, these computers basically use pirated Windows-XP software.

A server operating system, windows 2003 server 8200 costs 8200 yuan, covering 10 computers, and the license fee for each software of the other 90 computers is 230 yuan. In other words, an Internet cafe with 100 computers needs 28,900 yuan to buy genuine software.

Limited by consumption habits and compatibility of such software, it is almost impossible for Internet cafes to choose Linux operating system, and it is almost inevitable to choose Windows.

Since February, 2005, Microsoft has announced the large-scale implementation of "Genuine Value-added Plan" in China market. The price of WindowsXP operating system has been lowered in an all-round way, with 786 yuan for home edition and 1270 yuan for professional edition, while the previous market prices were 1400 yuan and more than 2,200 yuan respectively. At the same time, for the technical interception of ordinary pirated users, since February, Czech, Norwegian and China versions of Windows cannot use Microsoft's download website. After the pirated user upgrades the system, the dialog box "Only for 30 days" will appear, and the system will automatically lock after the time limit expires.

Microsoft produced a very cheap "paperback" operating system, which was launched in Thailand, Malaysia and other countries, almost around China, but it just didn't come to China.

Zhu Qing commented that computer piracy in China was deliberately condoned by Microsoft! This point has been very clear to people in the IT field around 2000. Many celebrities in the IT industry have also confirmed that conniving at the piracy process is Microsoft's intentional behavior-this is Microsoft's corporate strategy, and even an internal email of Microsoft has testified. Its deliberate indulgence can be traced back to 1998 or even earlier. At that time, China's high-tech industry and national software enterprises had a difficult start.

Almost 10 years. Who is the biggest loser of pirated Windows-XP software? Is it the American high-tech software industry represented by Microsoft? Or China's high-tech national software industry?

In the past 10 years, Microsoft adopted a deliberate strategy of conniving at piracy in China, acquiescing and even encouraging Chinese people to use pirated windows operating system. The pirated windows is basically the same as the genuine windows in function (Microsoft also acquiesced in the piracy upgrade through the network, so don't think that the pirates are high-powered, but in fact it is only Microsoft's intention). Microsoft's windows operating system has two prices in China, one is genuine 1400 yuan, and the other is pirated 5 yuan money. In this sense, the biggest manufacturer of pirated windows operating system is Microsoft itself, not others.

Microsoft's strategy of deliberately conniving at piracy in China has dealt a fatal blow to China's high-tech industries and national software enterprises, and its serious consequences for the development of high-tech enterprises in China have been clearly presented to the world:

In the mature ecological environment of Windows, under the strategy of Microsoft's deliberate indulgence of piracy, through a-> number of pirated software->; Impact on China software industry is->; Microsoft windows operating system monopolizes the domestic software market in China (genuine+pirated). Windows is like a drug, which makes most computer users in China unaccustomed to operating systems other than Windows. A large number of piracy and user habits cultivated by Windows have dealt a heavy blow to China's high-end software industry (except the downstream manufacturers of Microsoft).

Is it possible for China to develop its own operating system at the price of pirated windows operating system for only 5 yuan? Is it necessary for domestic genuine software to develop its own operating system? The research and development funds invested in the early stage have no billions or even more costs and huge investment risks? Are you sure of the results? Which operating system can sell for the price of 5 yuan money? That China software enterprises have such capital and strength to dare to take such risks? What stupid software company dares to develop such an operating system?

Under the strong competitive pressure and impact of Microsoft, China software enterprises, which are in their infancy and struggling to start, have long been defeated and have to turn to specialized software, system integration or technical services that are less affected by piracy. Domestic general system software, supporting software and application software products are shrinking, and its downward trend is almost irreversible. Compared with 1999, the number of domestic software enterprises has decreased by nearly half. Except for a few antivirus software, general software products in China software market are almost hard to find.

Jinshan Company, which produces office software WPS in China, was once considered as the most powerful enterprise in China to compete with Microsoft. However, under the strong competitive pressure and impact of Microsoft Office software piracy, the market gap space is getting smaller and smaller. Although Jinshan Company took a series of measures such as price reduction, it was defeated in the end and had to shift its future development focus to online game software.

Microsoft's monopoly on the domestic software market has predicted the decline of national software such as Kingsoft WPS. In the whole high-tech industry and national software enterprises in China, no company or software can compete with Microsoft. Is this good for China, our national software enterprises, our high-end software industry, and a country's security, economic interests and long-term development? Still harmful?

Microsoft represents the United States and the national will of the United States, and its own development is part of the global economic interests of the United States. It also constitutes the core interest of the United States-the lifeblood of the economy-the most powerful part of scientific and technological innovation. The United States clearly knows the importance of staying ahead and surpassing the scientific and technological strength of other countries, and realizes that this is the basis of American global economic hegemony and a key factor related to the survival of American countries and the fate of the next century. Therefore, it will never allow any country's powerful competitors to shake the foundation of its global economic hegemony!

In order to protect its core interests, the United States has been implementing a targeted strategy of deliberately attacking other countries' scientific and technological innovation capabilities on a global scale. Those countries that have the strength to challenge and shake the global economic hegemony of the United States, whether it is its allies-the European Union and Japan or its global strategic rivals-China and Russia, will face the deliberate attack of the United States as long as it is possible. For China, this deliberate attack is a plot against a big plane, a venture capital, and a strategy for Microsoft to deliberately condone piracy in China.

Microsoft's strategy of deliberately conniving at piracy in China, like McDonnell Douglas's big plane that helped China in those years, has hidden ulterior motives behind it, and has become another sharp weapon for the United States to ruthlessly stifle China's scientific and technological innovation capability-to deal a heavy blow to China's high-end software industry in an attempt to nip China's national software industry in the bud and cannot compete with it, with the aim of fundamentally supporting the global economic hegemony of the United States, safeguarding its global interests and weakening China's global economic strength. This covert, deceptive and harmful strategy of Microsoft has not attracted the attention and vigilance of our government and people. What does this result mean? Shouldn't we think deeply about the premature death of a big plane?

How do we deal with the ruthless strangulation of China's national software industry by Microsoft's deliberate strategy of conniving at piracy? How should we stop and counter the deliberate attacks of the United States on China's scientific and technological innovation capability for many years?

The anti-monopoly law of the European Union tries to prohibit Microsoft from using the Windows operating system to control the market. At the end of 2004, Microsoft was fined 497 million euros for bundling and asked to change the sales method of operating system, which brought great fetters to Microsoft's expansion in the European market. In other countries, Microsoft is not a green light all the way. In South Korea, Microsoft is struggling and is completely banned by local software. This is a very useful method and can be used for reference. On August 30th, 2007, China formulated and passed its own anti-monopoly law, which will be implemented on August 30th, 2008. This has dealt a profound blow to China's high-end software industry and brought a subtle turn for the better.

However, when we tried to use China's anti-monopoly law to deal with Microsoft's monopoly and expansion, we suddenly found a fact that we had to face: when Microsoft's piracy was rampant in China, due to the existence of a large number of piracy, the sales of Microsoft's genuine software were not high. On the surface, sufficient evidence shows that Microsoft is still the biggest "victim" of the whole piracy incident-China not only can't impose a huge fine on Microsoft, but may also deal with the complaint and punishment of Microsoft's "intellectual property rights being infringed by China"!

Microsoft's sinister intentions, vicious behind-the-scenes, long-term vision, ingenious ending design, accurate grasp of the development of the situation, and the strategy of hitting opponents hard and getting away with it all, are interlocking and impenetrable, leaving us at a loss, but in the end we are speechless and miserable. Isn't such an opponent terrible? Doesn't it deserve our high vigilance?

China's high-end software industry must embark on the road of independent development of technology and products, and have its own intellectual property rights, so as to occupy a place in the future global economic system, and make China surpass the United States in the field of science and technology in the 2 1 century, and then replace the United States as a new global economic center. The appearance of freely developed open source software Linux has brought us another opportunity and choice besides Microsoft.

Linux carries the hope that China's high-end software industry will move towards the future, and has become an indispensable key link in China's global strategy. At present, China, Japan and South Korea have reached an agreement on developing application software for Linux platform. In the near future, China will encourage more local software developers to turn to Linux and localize a certain proportion of software, which indicates a bright future for Linux in the long run.

How can China become a technological power and an economic power to compete with the United States, take industrial upgrading, and move from low-end and low-value to high-end and high-value? The long journey has just begun.

Although Linux has matured to a certain extent, it is not as "stupid" as window. Using Linux still requires some professional knowledge-for example, you have to learn to install almost all the simplest external devices. So at present, Linux and Unix basically occupy the server market, but the desktop market is almost zero. At present, Linux is mainly used for simple applications such as surfing the Internet and word processing, but large-scale games and professional software cannot support it. Linux is still a long way from the popularity of desktop computers, and it needs the long-term unremitting efforts of Chinese people.

From the era of great navigation to today's Internet era, China's economy started as a "world factory" and gradually moved towards intellectual property high-tech industry and international financial industry. Although China's success may not satisfy all China people, China's strength is constantly improving, China's influence is constantly expanding, and China's leader's concept of governing the country is naturally the most qualified ideological weapon to lead the progress of all mankind. The right to make rules in the future world will definitely be inseparable from China's contribution. The world needs to change and must change.

If the "world factory" is just an itch of the United States, and the United States happily accepts it, then the high-tech industry and the international financial industry are two sharp swords that will stab the American empire-completely shaking the foundation of the American global financial empire.

American capital interest groups know this well! This economic war is inevitable between China and the United States. We don't want to kill anyone. We pursue global harmony. However, the United States is unwilling to let the world economy that it single-handedly imprisoned get out of its control and damage its vested interests. They will try their best to interrupt the rise of the Chinese nation. We didn't start this economic war, but we were forced to fight or even win, otherwise the road to the rise of the Chinese nation would be interrupted by the United States. Is China ready to meet the opportunities and challenges of this millennium? Gentle trap, who will be the big winner between China and the United States in 2 1 century?

PS: There is a rumor on the Internet: If you mix it up, you will have to pay it back sooner or later. DB will hurt domestic software.

However, the hardware of a computer is only 3 ~ 4,000 yuan, and an operating system is a few k, so it is difficult to think about DB.

But d has always been really addicted. Think about Kaspersky, or general software factories such as KV to control DB.

Microsoft can let DB exist, but what is acquiescence without a smile?

It's time for us to think deeply.