The voice of canceling property is getting louder and louder. Do you support the cancellation of real estate?

I object to the cancellation of property.

The starting point of the national property management system is good, but the subsequent development has gone astray. The current property management system and mode should be further reformed, not abolished.

First of all, the property management regulations were promulgated and implemented in 2007. Its starting point is to improve people's living and working environment and improve the level of urban management.

Besides, a good property management company can really improve the internal environment of the community, improve the quality of the community, be responsible for the warranty, security, cleaning and so on of the community, and let the owners sit back and relax. It is also an appreciation of the house itself.

However, there is no denying that a considerable number of domestic property companies are very incompetent, which can be said to be mercenary, completely deviating from the original intention of setting up property management fees, without putting themselves in the owner's shoes, only thinking about all kinds of wealth, and there are many contradictions between the property and the owner. Because the service is not in place, the owner is unwilling to pay the property fee, the property can't receive the property fee, and the relevant personnel and equipment can't keep up, forming a vicious circle and even going to court.

At the same time, because most of the newly-built residential areas are settled by the property companies designated by the developers in advance, if the services of the property companies are not in place in the later period and the owners of residential areas want to change the property companies, they must vote through the owners' committee before they can be replaced and invited again. The procedure of setting up an industry committee in a community is quite complicated, and it is often impossible to set up an industry committee after staying for many years. Therefore, many property companies have no fear, openly oppose the owners, and are still obstructing the establishment of the industry Committee. Even if the industry committee is established and the original property company is removed, it is difficult for the newly recruited property company to settle in smoothly. The chaos here can be seen.

Finally, it is suggested that the state should intensify the in-depth reform of property management, start with the most basic contradictions, break the current chaos of property management, and give the people a healthy environment to live and work in peace and contentment.

I support the cancellation of property. The key is who will manage the property after cancellation. Nowadays, most properties only exist to make money and do some superficial work. There is a great contradiction between the property and the owner. I think the property should be abolished, and the owners' committee should hire several managers, formulate strict job responsibilities and manage the daily work of cleaning, security and maintenance in the community, and these daily work should be publicized by the owners' committee to recruit individual entities. Some jobs can also be recruited by a single person and directly managed by the management personnel recruited by the community sports commission. Of course, strict management responsibilities and regulations should be formulated in the implementation process. In this way, all the property fees paid by the owners can be used on demand. Of course, things are not so simple. There are still many things to study before the property management company is revoked.

It should have been cancelled a long time ago. Property is actually a platform for urban management. I also asked for a property refund the other day. She replied that I was busy. I don't know if my business is business. Not a penny less. It's so busy to break the contract, terminate the service and refund.

Firmly support the cancellation of property!

The property company didn't do anything originally, but the annual fee is very high, especially there are some overlord clauses, and the service after charging is poor, which is not worth paying at all, so it supports the cancellation.

Nowadays, many people are particularly disgusted when they talk about property companies. Basically, the relationship between property companies and owners has become antagonistic.

In many places, property companies basically exist in name only, whether they exist or not. Especially in the management of residential areas, some property companies are irresponsible, theft and other behaviors occur from time to time, and environmental sanitation is not cleaned in time, which makes people in residential areas feel insecure.

After the public facilities in the community were damaged, the property management company turned a blind eye and pretended not to see it, which aroused the contradiction between the owners and the property management company.

For example, the elevator here is broken, and the property management company wants the owner to raise money to repair the elevator, which makes everyone complain, and the contradiction with the property management company is getting deeper and deeper!

So resolutely support the cancellation of real estate!

Calling for property cancellation is actually that the property company has not done a good job. As a service company, we should provide good services for the owners. Owners are the main ones, followed by property companies. Unfortunately, in reality, the priorities are reversed. Property companies are not only not doing well, but also very strong. It is unrealistic to cancel the property. Owners also need property companies to provide daily services. You can't do everything by yourself. It is best to introduce some reasonable property management laws and regulations to restrict property rights, and it is the most practical to do a good job of service.

Property management company is a new industry that emerged after 1990s. As soon as the fence hits, it becomes a private territory, and any health and safety is your own business. This has become an excuse for the government to shirk its social responsibility and push it to the market to solve the health and safety problems of the community. In fact, community is also the basic field of society. Generally, grass-roots organizations such as neighborhood committees are established, and the health and safety of these basic areas should be borne by the government, not all citizens themselves. Can the safety of citizens be guaranteed by the safety of property? Can the sanitation of the community be kept beautiful and clean only by a few aunts? Everyone should understand that the community is also an integral part of society and the government has the responsibility. There is a basis for revoking the property company.

I support the cancellation of real estate. Many people are in favor of canceling the property, mainly because the property work in the community is too unsatisfactory. Nowadays, many properties do nothing but collect property fees, which is very overbearing. If the owner doesn't pay the property fee, it is common to cut off water and electricity. Nowadays, many high-rise buildings use credit cards to go upstairs and downstairs. If they don't pay the property fee, they can only climb the building without swiping their cards.

Some property services have a poor attitude, and there is no awareness of serving the owners of the community. They are more like yamen than yamen. Some properties post advertisements in public places or residential elevators for profit, which has nothing to do with the owners. Whether the property is good or not depends on the greening, maintenance, safety and hygiene of the community. In many properties, greening is basically not done, and maintenance has to be urged by the owners many times, let alone sanitation. Many walls are covered with stains and no one cleans them.

Of course, if the property is cancelled, there is still a realistic problem that must be faced, and that is how to ensure the daily operation of the community. Does the owners' committee hire a professional team to take care of all the work of the community, or keep the community running by other means?

Cancellation of property is not the purpose. In the final analysis, as a community owner, I hope that the service facilities in my community are perfect in all aspects, giving people a warm and comfortable home.

Support the cancellation of the property, which can be completely replaced by the community. Now the professional division of labor is very fine, and the existing work of the property can be subcontracted to professional companies for operation. There are cleaning companies for health, security companies for security, greening companies for greening, maintenance companies for maintenance and so on. In addition to raising a group of so-called managers, property companies basically call to urge property management fees, which means they are above the owners and do whatever they want. There are also many illegal properties, which have caused the majority of owners to attack the evil property forces. I also admit that there are a few properties here, and the service is good, but most or even most properties are mercenary and become candy for the owners. I can't get it off, I can't get it off. Therefore, we strongly appeal to the state to introduce relevant policies to cancel the existing property companies that are hated by the majority of owners and let the government's grassroots institutions and community organizations replace them. It is conducive to strengthening social harmony and promoting social stability.

I support the cancellation of the property, because the property is not to serve the owners at all, but to make money. In many residential properties in the fifth-tier city where I live, I arranged two retired old people to watch the door of the residential area and hired several cleaning staff to clean it up. There is no management and service at all. In order to collect parking fees, the roads in the community are often full of vehicles, and in serious cases, cars can't get through.

In the past, the kitchen of a family in our community caught fire, and the fire truck arrived soon after the alarm, but it was blocked by a car parked on the roadside at the entrance of the community and could not get in. No one asked someone to move the car temporarily, and the fire brigade could not bring the water to the building where the fire broke out more than 100 meters away! It took the firemen about 20 minutes to bring the hose to the fire place, and the firemen put it out.