Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Is it necessary to pay compensation for suing the whole building on the second floor for rebellion?

Is it necessary to pay compensation for suing the whole building on the second floor for rebellion?

Legal analysis: Whether the violation of water on the second floor requires compensation for the whole building depends on whether the residents of the whole building are at fault. If you are at fault, you need compensation. Under normal circumstances, the owners of the whole building share the responsibility. If it is a violation of water caused by improper sewer design, the responsibility shall be borne by the property company, and there is no need to compensate the whole building.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 295

Real estate owners are not allowed to dig holes to borrow soil, build buildings, lay pipelines and install equipment, endangering the safety of adjacent real estate.

Article 296

The property owner uses the adjacent property for water use, drainage, traffic, pipeline laying, etc. We should try our best to avoid causing damage to neighboring real estate owners.

Article 184

If the property of others is infringed, the property loss shall be calculated according to the market price at the time of the loss or other reasonable means.

Article 186

If neither the victim nor the actor is at fault for the occurrence of the damage, the loss shall be shared by both parties according to law.

Article 187

After the damage occurs, the parties may negotiate the payment method of the compensation fee. If negotiation fails, the compensation fee shall be paid in one lump sum; If it is really difficult to pay in one lump sum, it can be paid by installments, but the infringed party has the right to request the corresponding guarantee.