Where does the property come from to restrict owners from buying electricity?

For those properties that are easy to "self-expand", the owners need strong checks and balances.

Recently, a news that "the unauthorized price increase of property also restricts owners from buying electricity" has aroused public concern. Reportedly, Huaqingyuan Community in Baqiao District of Xi City belongs to affordable housing. In April this year, the property notice will increase the property fee from 0.44 yuan/square meter/month to 0.63 yuan/square meter/month. However, some owners refused to pay because the service could not keep up. Because of this, from April onwards, the owners went to the property to buy electricity and were told that they could not buy it at will. Some owners said, "I can only buy 50 kWh at a time, and some owners can only buy 10 kWh."

After that, Baqiao District Market Supervision Bureau ordered the residential property to be rectified, but the property personnel said that the increased property price did not exceed the government-guided price, but the procedure was illegal, and it was not mandatory to order rectification, which could not completely restrain the property.

The problem of owners' default on property fees is a difficult problem in property service management. In this storm, the report mentioned that some owners of the residential area have been in arrears with property fees for nearly 10 years, and this property can be completely solved through proper legal channels.

However, it is undoubtedly a misunderstanding to raise the standard of property fees and try to make up for the losses because a few owners are in arrears with property fees. How can all owners bear the mistakes of a few owners?

In any case, the property company should always adhere to the service orientation, resort to the law in time for problems such as arrears of property fees, and never retaliate against the owners through illegal means.

If the increase in property fees is the result of overlapping problems, then the property restrictions on residents to buy electricity are somewhat ultra vires. From the current point of view, even if the local market supervision department ordered rectification, it failed to stop the property from "restricting owners from buying electricity", and the arrogance was too arrogant.

In real life,

The service level of some property companies is not so good, but the collection of property fees is unambiguous, which is also the root of many contradictions among owners such as arrears of property fees. Under the background of similar property disputes, it is obvious that this kind of conflict needs to explore more effective supervision means.

It is necessary to strengthen the owner's right to speak by setting up community committees, so that the communication between the owner and the property can return to a benign and effective track. In this process, the relevant government departments should obviously take the initiative to help and guide the establishment and standardized operation of industry committees, and accelerate the establishment of owners' committees and the improvement of mechanisms.

In order to solve this problem, some places have put it on the agenda. For example, the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development launched the "Beijing Owner" APP, which solved the voting problem of the industry committee election. Every owner has obtained the qualification to vote through identity and real estate information authentication, and it can be completed in a few days from the initiation of voting to the final voting.

This is a powerful check and balance for those attributes that are easy to "self-expand".