The commercial dispute between Weilai Automobile and real estate agency was settled, and Weilai was executed 165438+ 10,000 yuan.

Financial Network Auto News Weilai Automobile was listed as the executor, with the execution target of 165438+ 10,000.

On the morning of March 23, the data of Sky Eye Survey showed that on March 8, Shanghai Weilai Automobile Co., Ltd., the operating entity of Weilai Automobile, was listed as the executor by the Jiading District People's Court of Shanghai, and the execution target was 1 10000.

Shanghai Weilai Automobile Co., Ltd. was established in 2065438+May 2005 with a registered capital of 2.5 billion US dollars. Legal Representative Qin, co-founder of Weilai Automobile. Is the company type a limited liability company (wholly owned by Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao)? , the company's business scope includes investment in areas where foreign investment is allowed by the state according to law; Technical development, technical service, technology transfer, technical consultation, wholesale and commission agency of new energy vehicles and related parts. , all provided by NIO? NEXTEV？ Limited company is wholly owned.

Caijing Automobile contacted the public relations department of Weilai Automobile for this purpose, and the relevant person in charge said that this was a normal business dispute between Weilai and the real estate agent. The two sides failed to reach an agreement on the work results and charging standards, and went through judicial channels. The court made a judgment on this, and Weilai fully respected the judgment of the court and cooperated with it according to law.

On March 1 1, some media reported that Shanghai Jiading District Court ruled that Shanghai Weilai Automobile Co., Ltd. should pay the intermediary service fee of 1 1 ten thousand yuan to Savills Property, as well as the overdue payment interest from May 20 17 to the actual payment date.

The cause of the incident was that Savills recommended Xingye taikoo hui Store to Weilai Automobile, but Weilai thought Savills only introduced the project to him and recommended the lessor, and did not participate in the negotiation of specific lease conditions or assist both parties in signing the lease contract, so it did not pay the commission. Subsequently, the court made a judgment to maintain the aforementioned first instance.

In this regard, Weilai Automobile told Caijing Automobile that it could not be rented because of some problems at that time, and finally we (Weilai Automobile) and the lessor settled the lease. The two sides can't agree on the charges.

Recently, Weilai Automobile just released the fourth quarter and annual financial report of 20 19. The revenue of Weilai 20 19 in the fourth quarter was 2.85 billion yuan, down 17 1% year-on-year, up 54.9% month-on-month, which basically met the market expectation of 2.838 billion yuan. The net loss was 2.89 billion yuan, narrowing by 17.8% year-on-year and expanding by 13.2% quarter-on-quarter, which was higher than the expected loss of 2.26 billion yuan.

In addition, the news of Weilai financing has continued recently. On March 5, 2020, Weilai posted an announcement on its investor relations website, announcing the completion of the $235 million convertible bond financing project again.

14 In February, the documents submitted by Gaoling Capital to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) showed that as of February 3 19, the institution no longer held shares in Weilai Automobile.

On February 18, there were rumors that Geely Automobile wanted to invest 300 million US dollars in Weilai Automobile, but Weilai denied the news.

On February 6 and February 14, Weilai announced on its investor relations website that it had successfully completed the convertible bond financing project with the amount of 1 billion US dollars each, and all the four Asian investment funds subscribed were pure financial investors. Together with the newly added $235 million, Weilai has announced that it has completed a total of $435 million in convertible bond financing within one month.

This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.