Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Is it cost-effective to buy Xianyang Road for self-occupation, and is there a phenomenon of disorderly construction?
Is it cost-effective to buy Xianyang Road for self-occupation, and is there a phenomenon of disorderly construction?
The people-oriented design concept of Xianyang Road creates a humanistic building with high green coverage and beautiful environment, which is very suitable for living. Xianyang Road is located in a place with convenient transportation, and the surrounding living facilities are complete. It is worthwhile to buy Xianyang Road for self-occupation. Moreover, Xianyang Road has a good environment, a good location and a large appreciation space.
Xianyang Road covers a large area and has a large space, and Xianyang Road has a professional property management team, so there is no disorderly construction. Moreover, Xianyang Road has a high greening rate and a beautiful environment, and it is not allowed to arbitrarily build and destroy the living environment of Xianyang Road.
The above contents are for reference only, I hope I can help you. Thank you for your support to Kanfangwang. I wish you a happy purchase!
- Previous article:Basic information of Futian Sun City
- Next article:What about the property of Green Time Garden (West District)?
- Related articles
- Take Ru Ping Expressway from Jianli, Hubei Province to Dongguan, Guangdong Province.
- What are the main disadvantages of Roland Town in China and Hongkong? Is it difficult to park?
- What is the address and telephone number of Wuchang District Court in Wuhan?
- What about Zhonghe Yibang (Beijing) Culture Co., Ltd.?
- How about Zifeng, the third phase of Dongfang Huafu in Dongguan Fu Ying? Is it worth buying? What is the floor area ratio?
- Is the blue moon and spring dawn in Hangzhou very biased?
- How to write the company's reward and punishment system?
- What is the telephone number of the sales office of Cangzhou Poly Lafite Mansion?
- Where is the tallest building in China?
- Is it legal for property companies to occupy public income?