Should the property be responsible for the fire in the shop?

Legal analysis: If a fire breaks out in a shopping mall, it should take full responsibility and be liable for compensation. If the fire is caused by the negligence or intention of a third person, the third person may be suspected of a criminal offence, and the third person shall bear the main liability for compensation. If the mall has faults such as imperfect fire-fighting facilities, or fails to find and put out the fire in the bud or in a small state in time, the mall is also at fault and should bear supplementary liability for compensation.

Legal basis: Article 275 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) intentionally destroys public or private property, and if the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or a fine; If the amount is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years.