Job Recruitment Website - Property management - The owner was monitored by the property for a year. Why didn't the property manager admit it?

The owner was monitored by the property for a year. Why didn't the property manager admit it?

Property, I don't know why I thought of contradiction when I heard this word. Sometimes there may be some problems between the property and the owner, but our life can not be separated from the property, water, electricity, heating and so on. Even the security and monitoring when going out are within this range.

Now, for safety reasons, most communities will install monitoring equipment. But what would you think if someone told you that the monitoring equipment in the community is also used to monitor your every move? Do you feel cold in your back? A few days ago, several owners of a residential area in Cheng Nan said that they had encountered such a wonderful thing. Mr. Yu, the owner, said that he was monitored by the residential property for almost a year. When he went out and when he went home, including the details of eating out, were photographed by the security guard and passed to the foreman manager. It is very detailed. Oh, my god, there is such a thing. I always thought those monitors were used when there were bad people. How can this deal with the owner?

It turned out that when Mr. Yu repossessed the building, he found that the house he bought was leaking. After many unsuccessful negotiations, Mr. Yu simply took all the developers and properties to court. This lawsuit was finally won, and this successful rights protection also made many owners in the same community choose to file a lawsuit with the property. At present, the service quality and working attitude of this property are more or less sloppy and not serious. Many rights and interests of public facilities belonging to owners cannot be effectively guaranteed. There are also some profitable links, including elevator advertising fees and road parking fees, which are monopolized by the property. It is quite irritating that the property that should serve people is used to monitor personal behavior to this extent, which also violates the owner's right to privacy. Fortunately, it's just monitoring.

The owner in this incident didn't understand his position at all. They are just "housekeepers" hired by the owners to serve and manage the community, instead of using countermeasures or even threatening the owners. I really hope that the property will get better and better in the future.