Development Status of China Property Management in China Property Management Industry

With the development of China's economy and cities, property management has formed a scale, and its benefits are becoming more and more obvious. For local governments, the economic benefits are mainly reflected in: reducing a large number of financial subsidies, improving the competitiveness of residential development enterprises in the property market, making the development enterprises' properties sell well and accelerating capital turnover. At the same time, perfect property management can establish a good corporate image for developers and attract more real estate developers and consumers. In terms of environmental benefits, the environment, layout, public security and overall architectural style of residential areas are integrated, which improves the comprehensive benefits of the real estate industry. However, there are still the following problems in the practice of property management:

(A) the property management structure is not perfect. At present, the primary problem of property management in China is the imperfect structure, and the system needs to be further straightened out and reconstructed. Among them, the relationship of responsibility, right and benefit among government, management committee and property management company needs to be further clarified. For example, there are three basic forms of housing property management in residential quarters built in Chengdu in recent years: one is managed by government real estate management departments, the other is managed by real estate developers, and the third is managed by property rights units themselves. These three property management modes each account for about 1/3. Moreover, many of them are biased in property management. Some property management enterprises ignore their own construction and regard property management only as a kind of charging service and simple production activities, so as to improve the level of enterprise development and professional management. There is no plan, no measures, no clear responsibility system for management objectives, no pressure and motivation for enterprises, no cost for management, and no accounting at the end of the year. They have countless ideas about which rules and regulations and management standards to establish, copying other people's rules and regulations and making them a mere formality. 

(2) The operation of supporting facilities is not ideal. At present, the investment and construction of residential areas are out of touch with property management, and there is no overall design and all-round operation from the whole process of property production, circulation and consumption. The operation of supporting facilities is not ideal, and property management lags behind housing consumption. There are few public facilities, shops, schools, banks and entertainment facilities, and these commercial outlets are still "in name only" for various reasons. 

(3) Poor maintenance. Once the residential area or office building fails, report to the property management company (such as elevator damage, water pipe leakage, switch damage, security door failure, wall ash, etc.). ), often can't be solved in time. The reason is that property management companies are powerless in these areas. They don't have all kinds of professional knowledge and necessary maintenance teams and facilities. Once they receive maintenance complaints, they can only report or apply for maintenance to other relevant units, which obviously does not meet the professional property management standards. 

(d) Property management funds are unsustainable. Property management, like construction, also needs capital investment. In property management, the principle of "who benefits, who invests" should be implemented to form the source of property management funds. However, the traditional concept of welfare housing consumption still has considerable inertia, and many families often understand property management as free service or low compensation service. This is contrary to the principle of residential consumption under the condition of socialist market economy, and it is also a major crux that affects the smooth development of property management. 

(E) The legal system of property management is not perfect. The national laws and regulations on residential property management are not perfect, such as property management system, property management funds, qualification examination of residential property management companies, acceptance and handover of residential property, etc. Other major issues of residential property management need to be further clarified. Therefore, it is difficult to bring property management into the track of legal management, and the standardization of property management in residential quarters lacks the fundamental guarantee of legal system. 

(six) the relationship between the property management company and the relevant social aspects is not smooth. Property management companies are closely related to streets, neighborhood committees, public security, transportation, environmental protection, health, municipal administration, gardens, education, public utilities, commerce, culture and entertainment. Because the scope of work is not clear and the relationship is not harmonious, it has become a prominent contradiction in residential property management. 

(7) Property management is not in place. At present, some property management companies do not take "property management" as the core, but focus on diversified operations, or are limited to rent collection and general maintenance, but fail to maintain the appearance, public parts and surrounding environment of buildings, actively maintain equipment and improve the use function and economic value of properties, not to mention special services. 

(VIII) Uneven development among regions. Provinces (cities, districts) declare participating in the national excellent management residential quarters, accounting for less than 30% of the total number of residential quarters in the country, and participating cities account for less than 1% of the cities in the country. Six provincial capital cities failed to participate in residential quarters. There are not only objective factors of the economic development difference between the North and the South, but also the tendency of the competent authorities to "emphasize construction and neglect management".