Do you have to pay property fees for parking spaces?

In common cases of property disputes, most owners will refuse to pay the property management fee because the service of the residential property company is not in place. Then, there are many reasons why owners refuse to pay property fees. Are the following reasons valid? Case: The owner, Mr. Wang, has been living in Community A since he bought a house in 2004. After many years, at 20 1 1, Mr. Wang started the scooter again. Who knows that just after driving the new car home, the security personnel of the residential property will not allow Mr. Wang's vehicle to enter the residential area. Mr. Wang had to communicate with the residential property company, and the answer was that there were two parking spaces in the residential area, one of which was an underground parking space, which was purchased by the owner when he bought a house. Mr. Wang didn't buy a parking space, so he couldn't park his car underground. The other part is ground parking. Because the number of ground parking spaces planned by the community is limited and has been occupied by existing owners, Mr. Wang's car can't stop. Mr. Wang said that the parking spaces on the ground have indeed been occupied by some owners, but it is unreasonable for some owners to occupy two or even three parking spaces. At the same time, there are some green spaces in the community, and property companies can open up green spaces for parking. Mr. Wang asked the property company to sell and help coordinate, but the parking problem has never been solved. Mr. Wang was angry and refused to pay the property fee from 20 13. Later, the residential property company sued the court and asked Mr. Wang to pay the property fee. The judge suggested that in this case, Mr. Wang refused to pay the property fee because the property company failed to plan and arrange the parking space reasonably. Mr. Wang thinks that the property company has not fulfilled the property service contract, so he refuses to pay the property fee. Then, can Mr. Wang's reason for refusing to pay the property fee be supported by the court? Property companies provide property services for residential areas, and the management of parking also belongs to the category of property management. However, in this case, the problem of no parking space advocated by Mr. Wang does not belong to improper property management in the community, nor does it belong to the legal reason for not paying property fees. Underground parking spaces in the community are sold by developers. Mr. Wang didn't buy a parking space, so naturally he couldn't park. The ground parking spaces in the residential area are occupied by other owners, and there is no unauthorized occupation by the property management company. For the part that has been planned as a parking space in the community, it belongs to the public area of the community, and the rights belong to all owners of the community. The property management company only provides management and has no right to allocate the parking spaces used by other owners who occupy multiple parking spaces to Mr. Wang; For the part that is not planned as a parking space, the property company has no right to set up parking spaces without authorization. In the end, the court ruled that Mr. Wang paid the property fee.