Is the slag discharge fee a pool area?

I think it is unreasonable to calculate the pool area in the garbage disposal fee for new house decoration.

The pool area is the difference between the so-called contract area of house purchase and the actual area inside the house, which generally includes the area of tube well, corridor and wall. The owner has paid the cost of this area when buying a house. Personally, it is unreasonable to recalculate the pool area for the decoration garbage cleaning fee.

First of all, this part of the area is shared by everyone, but every household has paid the same price for this part of the area, which is essentially equivalent to charging the public part repeatedly. In addition, when the garbage is removed, many owners pack and pile the garbage in their own houses, which does not occupy the pool area and affects the smooth flow of public passages. The use of elevators as a public resource is inevitable, but every owner has also paid the corresponding property management fee before moving in, which has included the cost of using elevators, so the pool area should not be calculated. In fact, the term pool area only exists in China now, like the property purchased abroad, there is no such term at all, so this is actually unreasonable. However, the current reality is that there is no relevant law clearly stipulating how to regulate the management of various expenses arising from the pool area, which leads the owners to pay only for the pool area.

In addition, developers and properties generally only register the contract area of each household, and rarely register the actual interior area except the pool area, so many times for their own convenience, they choose to directly use the contract area to collect various fees, including slag removal fees. In fact, in my opinion, it is not a question of money, but whether one's legitimate rights and interests have been protected. Therefore, in order to make the supervision and management of the real estate market more reasonable in the future, the owners should speak out and strongly demand that their legitimate rights and interests are not harmed. I don't think they should pay this part of the cost.