The electric car parked in the carport of the community was stolen and reported to the police. Do I have the right to ask the property to monitor?

According to the provisions of Articles 46 and 47 of the Property Management Regulations, the property management company has the obligation to carry out the work of community safety prevention; According to Article 7 of the Consumer Protection Law, consumers have the right to safety; According to the provisions of Article 37 of Tort Liability Law, shopping malls have the obligation of security, and monitoring is one of the means for property companies and shopping malls to realize the obligation of security. Property companies, shopping malls and other public places have the obligation to provide surveillance videos and cooperate with owners and consumers to find clues.

Once an accident occurs in a public place, the request to view the surveillance video is rejected, and the public must call the police in time. After the police arrive, the parties may request the police to collect and seal the evidence. Even if the surveillance video can't be retrieved immediately, the parties should let the police record and apply for "saving the video". In this way, in the future, if the responsible unit fails to submit the video on the grounds that the time is too long or expired, it will bear the responsibility of "unable to prove", and the court will presume that the litigant's claim is established.

In addition, after the accident, the parties can immediately apply to the people's court for pre-litigation evidence preservation, and the people's court will seal up the surveillance video through technical means to ensure that the evidence will not be missing.