The woman lent the parking space to her neighbor for three years and wanted to take it back, but it became the other person's name. What was the result?

Ms. Ning is the owner of the community, and parking space S093 is rented by Ms. Ning. From 20 12, she paid the parking fee until September this year. Because there was no parking space in the middle, she lent the parking space to her neighbor Mr. Zhang for three years. Later, Ms. Ning wanted to park her own car, so she greeted her neighbors in advance and said that she wanted to get this parking space back. Because her neighbor paid the parking fee in advance, she returned the money paid by her neighbor for three months to 240 yuan.

However, when she went to the property to change the car number, she was told by the property that her neighbor Mr. Zhang had paid the parking fee for another three months, which was paid to 65438+February 20, and the property changed the parking space user to the neighbor Mr. Zhang's name without her consent.

Ms. Ning believes that although it is a long-term parking space and has no property rights, even if there are not enough parking spaces, the property should inform them in advance that she is the owner and has the right to know in advance, and her neighbors are only tenants, not to mention that she never said that she would not use this parking space.

In this case, Ms. Ning and I found the property manager together. The property manager's attitude is a bit horizontal, indicating that whoever pays for the parking space will use it. Ms. Ning can't produce evidence to prove that she gave the money to the other party during this time. Ms. Ning said there were recordings, but they were not courts. If you park your car in the parking space and block someone else's car, they can only lock it.

Whoever pays seems to have no problem. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the right to use the above-ground parking space does not have the right to use it permanently. However, it is an omission for the property to change the right to use the parking space without consulting the owner.

If Ms. Ning wants to prove that the parking space is hers, she needs to have this written contract. If not, the parking fee receipt can also prove that if the right to use the parking space has changed, if the property cannot provide evidence, the right to use the parking space should still be Ms. Ning's.

The property said that Ms. Ning only had recordings and could not produce evidence to prove that she had given the money to her neighbors. In this case, I guess there may be two situations. First, the cash is returned to the other party and no evidence can be retained. Second, there is a transfer certificate, but it is not convenient to show it to others. The neighbor is a tenant, but Ms. Ning lent her parking space to the other party for three years. It is not clear whether her borrowing behavior is paid or unpaid.

The parking fee for residential property in 240 yuan is 3 months, which shows that the parking fee is very cheap. Ms. Ning lent the parking space to her neighbor and told her in advance to take it back, but the other party continued to pay the parking fee and did not answer the phone. This behavior is very unkind. Neighborhood should live in harmony, not at the expense of others, communicate in time if there is any problem, and it is guilty not to answer the phone.

At present, to solve this problem, we can only rely on the property, owners and tenants to negotiate and communicate, because there is no written contract to prove the ownership of the right to use the parking space. The community industry committee, the property and the owner should negotiate and sign a written contract when renting the parking space to clarify the ownership, rent and change of parking space, so as to avoid disputes in the future. As a service unit, property should give priority to protecting the rights and interests of owners after charging property fees, and can't be the owner instead of the owner!