My unit is a property management company. Now, because the parking card issued by my unit says "the right of final interpretation", it has been investigated by the industrial and commercial bureau and

My unit is a property management company. Now, because the parking card issued by my unit says "the right of final interpretation", it has been investigated by the industrial and commercial bureau and decided to stop from the date of issuing the card. What is the basis of punishment? Which law!

Because there are many laws on the issue of "the right of final interpretation", but the specific punishment may be different in different places, so I can't tell you whether you are illegal or not.

But "having the final interpretation right", another old comrade in my unit and myself had differences before, and the superior didn't give a clear answer!

That old comrade thinks that both sides have the final right to interpret some things, so it's no problem for you to say "the final right to interpret". But if you say "the final interpretation right belongs to our company", this will not work. I can understand the difference between these two sentences, but I have a different opinion!

In my opinion, the final interpretation right is unique and can only be obtained by one party! It's like time, only the last second, it's impossible for two time points to pass at the same time! So when you say "having the final interpretation right", you deprive the other party of the "final interpretation right". In other words, this "final interpretation right" can be owned by both parties, but it doesn't necessarily belong to either party, and you can't grab it!

And now the industrial and commercial departments are generally implementing it according to my statement. So if you ask me if I'm legal or not, I'm definitely not. If it's no trouble, you can try administrative reconsideration according to another point I mentioned above after the punishment decision is made, or it's really no trouble to go to court and see which one can win!