Legality of property holding

If you have money, you can be willful. Did you get it in the action of a local tyrant in Wuhan? Perfect? Verification.

This matter refers to a Wuhan? Local tyrants? Owners bought 556 parking spaces in the same batch on the occasion of the listing of new houses. Buy and sell, and only for community residents? Sell? Not renting, it caused a hot discussion among netizens for a time. During the period, some residents in the community suspected that it was virtual property? Owner? , false transactions, mainly for the overall parking space? Is it reasonable? The price increase made the whole incident city near the sea.

There are two kinds of voices on the internet now.

First, normal business is understandable.

Buy it and sell it. Since it is a legal procedure, local tyrants are willing to buy a parking space, which is also a free buying and selling behavior in the market. And now the owner says it can be sold, so there is no problem of wasting public resources. Moreover, there are currently more than 1600 parking spaces in the community, which is not completely monopolized and belongs to earning? Second-hand charges are reasonable, and some owners' doubts are completely over-interpreted.

The second kind, holding sales on behalf of others, is totally routine.

According to the insider of the community, this Xu signed a consignment agreement with the community developer. After Xu bought it, he could sell it in the sales center. First of all, this consignment is suspected of monopoly. What is this for? Hunger marketing? .

Fortunately, in the end, under the adjustment of the property, the property buyer Xu decided to give in and rent some parking spaces to other owners of the community as a result, and the result was satisfactory.

Personally, I don't want to say whether I have the right to package and resell at one time. First of all, I would like to ask the relevant departments to investigate whether this hero owner really exists or whether the developer property has joined hands. Bureau? . Excluding the above situation, let's talk about the owner. Money can be willful, but it can't harm the interests of the whole community. Almost every family has a car now. According to this logic, if individuals monopolize purchases, malicious speculation and monopoly operations in the future, the whole community will be inconvenient to travel, which will also form a kind of? Money is a priority? Bad atmosphere. Developers and properties are directly packaged? Cutting? This practice is really not worth advocating.