3 1 year-old proprietress was robbed and killed in the elevator in the early morning, and her husband actually sued the security guard afterwards. Why?

The husband of the murdered victim wanted to sue the security guard because he thought his wife might have time to be rescued. But because the security guard refused to monitor him all the time, his wife was killed, so he wanted to sue the security guard and thought it was the responsibility of the security guard. In fact, it is really strange that this incident puts all the responsibilities on the property security side. The case itself has many doubts, and the husband of the deceased also has many strange places. Now, if the wind blows all the way to the property security, it will make people feel that he is using this to clear his suspicion.

Let's talk briefly about what happened first: At about 3 am on May 28th, Ms. Zhang from Fuzhou, Jiangxi called her husband and told him that Mr. Liu was going to have a midnight snack with friends and asked him to wait for his wife in the underground parking lot. At 3: 04 in the morning, Mr. Liu called his wife, Ms. Zhang, but no one answered. Her husband sent WeChat and called again, but no one answered. So Mr. Liu felt strange, so he ran from the underground parking lot to a security room upstairs and asked him to help him monitor and see what happened. The security guard refused to take surveillance, saying that no one could help him find it now, so Mr. Liu went out to find it himself and waited for an hour before returning to the security room to watch the surveillance video. The video shows that his wife was followed into the elevator by a man wearing a black vest at 3: 06 am, holding a white bag in her hand. Obviously, she came prepared. Then his wife was dragged out of the elevator by the man and taken to the wilderness to rob and kill the body. And the property also has a large part of responsibility to bear.

0 1: Let outsiders enter and leave the community at will. Now residential areas are generally property management. Only people who live in the community will let them in and out at will, and outsiders need someone from the community to pick them up or the property will call the residents to agree before they can enter. Obviously, the property security of this community has not done so. At three o'clock in the morning, outsiders can enter and leave the community at will, which has no good security for the residents of the community. Therefore, Mr. Liu believes that property safety has a great responsibility. If you have an access card or don't let him in, no bad guy will rob his wife and kill him.

02: I didn't cooperate with Mr. Liu in time, resulting in missing the rescue time. Mr. Liu thinks that his wife may be in danger, so let the security guard have a look. At this time, the security guard refused to let Mr. Liu look again. At 3: 04 in the morning, Mr. Liu asked the security guard to watch the monitoring. His wife was followed into the elevator by a man at 3: 06 in the morning. If the security guards can cooperate at this time, there is a great chance to save his wife. Unfortunately, the security guard has been away, which also caused Mr. Liu to look outside for more than an hour, so Mr. Liu thought it was the fault of the security guard.

In fact, the security guard is also quite wronged. His authority is not high enough to monitor residents at will, which obviously does not meet the requirements of the system. And Mr. Liu also has many doubts in this case. For example, since his wife wants to go out for a midnight snack together, why not meet at the gate of the community but in the underground parking lot? Why don't you go home first or contact your wife and friends when you find that your wife has lost contact? I stayed outside for over an hour. Where did you find it? Are you doing this to prove your alibi? In a word, many doubts in this case are worth pondering, as if things are not just robbery and murder.