The company requires us to pay the property fee (prepaid), mortgage deposit and maintenance fund before allowing us to look at the house and hand over the house. Is this reasonable?

Provide reference opinions as follows:

1. If you don't understand the charges, you can ask them to explain on the spot, such as taking out documents and regulations. Do what you think is reasonable after the explanation, and complain to the Housing Authority, the Price Bureau or the Consumer Protection Committee unreasonably.

2. As for the article "If the relevant house handover procedures are not handled within the date and time specified in this notice, the house is deemed to have been delivered to you since the date specified in this notice", I guess the developer may have evaded the risk of late delivery. That is, the overdue delivery procedures cannot be counted as the developer's overdue delivery. The actual house transfer signature (that is, house delivery) should be clearly defined in the contract, such as obtaining the house key. No one sent a piece of paper.

3. In the process of handing over the house, the most unclear thing for both parties is the so-called "housing quality problem". For example, the wall is uneven, the door frame feels crooked, a screw is dropped on the window, and the room smells. Remember: the new house is inevitably flawed, as long as it is not a major threat to the safety of living, it is not enough reason to refuse the house. If you think it is a major quality problem, you have to ask a qualified housing quality appraisal department to check it, and they will issue an appraisal certificate to prove it. Other minor problems can be listed and rectified within the specified time. Housing equipment configuration is less than or lower than the standard stipulated in the contract, which can be handled according to the contract.