What is the charging standard for the second-class property in the elevator room?

There is no such standard, or rather, there is no relevant national standard.

There is no national unified property charging standard, the main reasons are as follows:

1. Costs and expenses cannot be unified.

Property management fees are different from ordinary commodity prices, and a unified price standard can be implemented in the whole country or most areas. According to the Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges, property fees are calculated according to the cost of property management, including staff salaries, materials, energy and taxes. In these projects, first of all, the salary of personnel is not a fixed value. The average social wage of each county and city in China is different, and the gap between developed and poor areas can be several times. Property enterprises themselves are labor-intensive enterprises, and labor costs often account for 60% or more of service costs. The uncertainty of labor cost also causes the difference of property service cost in different places. Moreover, in property management, the cost of energy and materials cannot be unified. It is obvious that energy standards are not uniform. The hydropower prices set by the National Development and Reform Commission are all zoned pricing. The material cost is not uniform. For example, two communities with the same size and the same number of households, one uses ordinary domestic elevators and the other uses imported advanced elevators. The elevator maintenance costs in these two communities are definitely different. There are other equipment and facilities in similar situations.

2. Different service standards.

China's north and south regions are vast, but due to different natural conditions, the service items and service standards of property in different regions are also different. In fact, since the implementation of the Property Management Regulations, China has formulated its own regional property service standards on the basis of prefecture-level regions. The service standards in neighboring areas are different, and it is more difficult to unify the standards between distant areas. Moreover, the service classification methods in different regions are fragmented. For example, Beijing's property services are divided into five grades, while neighboring Tianjin's property services are divided into four grades. This has led to the inequality of services at all levels in various regions.

Service costs are not uniform, service standards are not uniform, and service classification is not uniform. Naturally, the standard of property fees cannot be unified.

According to the Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges, the final solution of the property fee charging standard is still determined by the market mechanism. What kind of needs the owners have, what kind of services the property management company can provide, and the cost of these services shall be settled through consultation between the property management company and the owners, and shall be stipulated in the property management service contract to make it an implementation standard.