Provisions of Civil Code on Decoration Deposit

Our country's law does not stipulate the decoration deposit, but the property service enterprises should abide by the regulations when collecting the property service deposit and deposit, and it is strictly forbidden to charge the deposit and deposit in disguised form. According to Article 36 of the Notice on Printing and Distributing the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Suzhou Property Service Charge Management, property service enterprises shall collect property service deposits and deposits in accordance with regulations, and it is strictly forbidden to collect fees in the form of deposits and deposits. The realty service enterprise shall not collect decoration deposit or security deposit from the owners and property users. If the realty service enterprise needs to charge for providing additional services other than basic services for the decoration activities of the owners and property users, it can report to the city, county-level city price department and the property management administrative department according to the actual cost, and implement it after the charging standard is approved. According to Article 52 of the Property Management Regulations, if the owner needs to decorate the house, he shall inform the property service enterprise in advance. The realty service enterprise shall inform the owners of the prohibited acts and matters needing attention in the house decoration.

Legal objectivity:

Article 143 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) is valid if a civil juristic act meets the following conditions: (1) The actor has corresponding capacity for civil conduct; (2) the meaning is true; (three) does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and does not violate public order and good customs. Article 153 of the Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * A civil juristic act that violates the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations is invalid. However, unless mandatory provisions do not invalidate civil legal acts. A civil legal act that violates public order and good customs is invalid.