Last year, the main heating pipe in my residential area was replaced, but the owner was required to bear the cost of the renovation. If the owner doesn't pay, it will stop heating. Does this violate t

Last year, the main heating pipe in my residential area was replaced, but the owner was required to bear the cost of the renovation. If the owner doesn't pay, it will stop heating. Does this violate the property law? According to the Property Management Ordinance, it is illegal. Because "fifty-second water supply, power supply, gas supply, heating, communications, cable television and other units shall bear the responsibility for the maintenance and conservation of related pipelines and facilities in the property management area according to law. The above-mentioned companies provide water, electricity, gas and heating to the community and owners, which is also a cost behavior caused by operation and should bear the expenses.

However, in many places, in order to save the high design and construction costs of professional companies, developers entrust their own design and construction. Therefore, in the operation of the community, once there is a pipe network problem, professional companies do not care, only developers bear it. What should I do if the developer proposes that the community has moved in and the facilities have passed the quality warranty period? One is to apply for the use of overhaul fund, and the other is to share it with all owners.

If the property management company organizes the construction, it must inform all the owners of the cost sharing method in advance after the construction, otherwise the owners are unwilling to bear it after the construction, and the property management company is bound to become a big head. Because there is no right to stop heating and force charges. If the owners sue collectively, the court will not support the property management company because there is no such service content in the service contract.