How to treat the accident that a 2-year-old girl in Changsha took the elevator to 18 building and fell to her death?

First, the property is an iron pot, and the protection is not done well. The place where children can reach at will is too hidden. Second, the boy's guardian, as the perpetrator, must bear this responsibility, but he does not speculate on the child with the worst mind, and death is a prank;

Third, there is no guardian around the two-year-old child. This parent's heart is too big. With the tragedy of the parents holding two children in the mall before, I hope there will be prenatal education before giving birth to children in the future. Parents who give birth to boys and girls should bear secondary responsibility. Yes, it's a prank to push a two-year-old into the elevator and press the 18th floor. But there is a basic question: will taking a person, even a two-year-old child, to a specific floor by elevator bring him the danger of falling? Of course not. Every floor of a normal building should be safe and there should be no risk of falling. There is no causal relationship in the sense of crime between the damage result and the boy's prank. Even if it involves civil liability, it should be borne by the property that directly leads to the fall, followed by the responsibility of the boy's parents and the responsibility of the girl's parents for negligence. Of course, there are Xiong Haizi in the world, and they will certainly do some harm, but they are not omnipotent, so they can't just put the pot on ignorant children. It's really hard to know whose bear is to blame when criticizing a five-year-old child who has no ability to judge the danger of behavior. That's just a five-year-old boy. You have to treat him as a psychopath. You suspect that he pressed the button to kill the little girl on 18 floor. How did the little boy know that the little girl would fall when she was sent to 18 floor? Besides, there is no glass. If the little boy wants to kill the girl, he should send the little girl to the eighteenth floor and throw it down. If you say that the little boy made an alibi to prevent leaving fingerprints and other evidence, then I have nothing to say. Not to mention a little boy, even a serial killer, he can't guarantee that a two-year-old girl will die if she is sent to the eighteenth floor. As for what you said about pressing other floors, it is really fate. I have seen an old man wandering by the roadside with my own eyes. Two cars collided and the flying debris killed the old man. So who do you think caused the car accident and killed the old man? After all, grandpa can't die without any details.

Let's face it, this is a prank played by a little boy when a little girl fell from a building. The little boy is naturally responsible, but it is not far-fetched enough to intentionally kill, or even indirectly kill. Is this the butterfly effect? The first is the supervision of guardians, the second is the management of property, and then the problem of little boys. According to what you said, the 1- 17 floor of the property is well maintained, but the 18 floor is not maintained. Is that intentional homicide? Don't cling to coincidence,