How did the court decide that the old man died unexpectedly and accompanied the security guard to be prosecuted?

In fact, there are many cases in life for reference. Many netizens expressed their appreciation for such behavior. Everyone doesn't want to see a life disappear and will try their best to save it. However, this is something to be commended. Some bad guys take advantage of everyone's kindness and deliberately pretend to fall and get hurt on some unsupervised roads to touch good people. Such cases keep happening. Let everyone have a new understanding of the concept of saving lives, that is, people who are deeply afraid of falling are deliberately blackmailing themselves. Such a small move has caused them huge losses, which makes them? Save people? The word has gradually taken on other meanings.

A security guard has been in trouble recently. He is a property security guard. While patrolling the community, he found an old man selling vegetables on the roadside suddenly fainted. He immediately called the rescue phone and accompanied the old man to the hospital for treatment, but the old man still didn't get treatment and died after being rescued. That is, when the security guard thought that he had fulfilled the responsibility of saving people, he suddenly received a summons from the court, saying that his family wanted him to pay compensation. In this case, the court finally rejected the family's claim. The reason for being rejected is actually very simple. During the incident, there was monitoring inside the community as evidence. Security guards have repeatedly explained to the elderly that they can't set up stalls to sell vegetables at will in the community. The obligation has been fulfilled, but the security guards did not have any contact during the whole process of buying food for the elderly, and there was no violent expulsion. When the old man was sick, the security guard also fulfilled the obligation to call for help and send him to the hospital. There is nothing wrong with such a move, and the security guard has done his duty. The court's decision is also based on.

Now a lot of evidence is indeed obtained through monitoring, and the distrust between people is very obvious. We can only do our duty well.