Fire property compensation

Legal analysis: Specifically, there are several opinions about the court's ruling of less compensation. First, there are certain mistakes in the process of handling cases. First, after receiving feedback from neighbors, the property company did not go to the scene in time to take emergency measures to minimize the losses, but ignored them. In this respect, it is useless. Second, even if the property company doesn't have the key, it can call the police for help, or take emergency measures to force the door to enter in the presence of a third person. To sum up, there are two points. There is a certain liability for compensation. The leakage protection switch belongs to your own facilities, so you should maintain it yourself. Property management companies do not have this obligation. Even the maintenance you entrust is within the scope of paid services.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 165 Where an actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others through fault and causes damage, he shall bear tort liability.

Article 182 If property losses are caused by infringing upon the personal rights and interests of others, compensation shall be made according to the losses suffered by the infringed party or the benefits obtained by the infringer; It is difficult to determine the losses suffered by the infringer and the benefits gained by the infringer. If the infringer and the infringed party fail to reach an agreement on the amount of compensation and bring a lawsuit to the people's court, the people's court shall determine the amount of compensation according to the actual situation.