Who are those people who cry all day to cancel their properties, or what is their psychology?

Most of the people who suggest canceling the property are owners who think they have not received the corresponding service. They put forward this idea based on their psychological resistance to the property company. In the network society, so many owners have opinions on property companies, and they must have their reasons; As the owner, I am not satisfied with the property management of my own community.

However, most of the owners of these "recommended properties" may not be senior managers. They know little about social division of labor and community management mode, which is obviously emotional. However, the lack of service of property management companies has aggravated the resistance of owners. Especially around the issue of paying property fees, property companies only charge fees, but related services have not been followed up in time. As for the owners, they think that after paying the property fee, they should get satisfactory service. Because the owner has no way to restrain the property company except refusing to pay the property management fee.

The owner's refusal to pay the property management fee is probably a decision made under the background of "no complaints". If the property management company can solve all kinds of problems raised by the owners in time, it is unlikely that the owners will refuse to pay the property fees. In this regard, it is necessary for property companies to reflect on themselves and find out the root of the problem to solve it. For the owner, refusing to pay the property fee can only be a last resort. Hurriedly "driving away" real estate companies is not worth the loss. "Dongshan tigers eat people, and Xishan tigers eat people." I changed several real estate companies, and as a result, one is not as good as the other.

So, someone came up with the idea of setting up an "owners' committee" to replace the property management company. Street communities also need to manage communities. These seemingly "fashionable" ideas are actually naive, and only owners who lack management experience will have such fantasies. As a loose NGO, the "owners' committee" is also "elected". Real estate companies are difficult to supervise. Alternative real estate companies are hard to succeed. Sub-district offices and communities have corresponding management functions, and they have no energy or power to manage the specific affairs of the community.