Job Recruitment Website - Property management - The locks of more than 0/00 owners in a residential area in Guangzhou were forcibly removed. How does the property respond to this?

The locks of more than 0/00 owners in a residential area in Guangzhou were forcibly removed. How does the property respond to this?

The property said that the reason for doing this was mainly because it was operated in accordance with relevant regulations, and also said that the owners should cooperate with relevant regulations in special periods.

The relationship between property and owners is always inseparable. Moreover, most owners hope that they can maintain a good relationship with the property in the process of housing. In this case, there will still be some disputes between the property and the owners. Therefore, many people feel that there is a great contradiction between property and owners.

The locks of more than 0/00 owners' homes in a residential area in Guangzhou were forcibly removed.

The owner of a community in Guangdong broke the news that he was still in the process of hotel isolation, but his home was demolished. It also means that the doors of more than 0/00 households in the whole community/KLOC are forcibly removed. So that the owners have a particularly unacceptable feeling, and after this incident was exposed, many netizens began to pay attention to the progress of this matter.

The response of the property to this matter.

Secondly, in this case, the property also said that the reason why the lock of the owner's house was forcibly removed was mainly because someone was hiding at home and did not cooperate with the epidemic. Therefore, in this case, according to the decision of the relevant CDC and neighborhood Committee, the lock of the owner's house was forcibly removed. However, this response has not been recognized by the owners, nor has it been understood by netizens.

My personal opinion on this matter.

Finally, I personally feel that in this matter, the practice of property gives people an incomprehensible feeling. Because the property can communicate with the owners in other ways, instead of choosing this violent way to cause greater pressure on the owners. After all, this practice not only damages the lock of the owner's house, but also makes the owner feel that owning such a property makes him feel particularly unstable in the process of living in the house. So I think the property should apologize to the residents concerned for their actions.