Can ordinary taxpayers in the construction industry deduct 3% if they adopt simple tax calculation?

Before discussing the "vacant house property fee", let's look at two cases:

Case 1: The female owner kneels to the property manager with her child in her arms. Seeing the word "kneel", it is estimated that many people are surprised. Since ancient times, sons have always knelt down to their fathers and ministers, but I have never heard of an owner kneeling down to a property manager.

However, in a residential area in Shaanxi Province, such a wonderful scene happened. Because of the long-term problems at home, female owners need the property company to coordinate and solve them. However, the property company shirked it for a long time, and finally the female owner could only stop paying the property fee.

However, property management companies also have ways. In this old community, the owner's water and electricity charges are all paid by the property, so the property manager decided that when the female owner recharges, only the water fee of 10 yuan can be recharged at a time. (Other households recharge 1 1,000 yuan at a time, and the upper limit is not capped. )

Finally, the phenomenon of "kneeling down" for water appeared.

Case 2: The property manager said, "We don't serve, and you also need to pay the property fee". There is a video circulating on the Internet. The property manager shouted to the owner: "We don't serve, you have to pay 100% of the property fee."

In the video, we can clearly see a young male owner (about 30 -35 years old) telling his difficulties to the property manager. The owner said that his family's problems have been reflected intermittently for at least 8 times, but the property still has not given any solution. In the end, I can only choose not to pay the property fee. In the eyes of the owners, the property management company failed to fulfill its due responsibilities. Since we can't serve the owners, we should stop paying the property fees reasonably.

The elderly property manager (between 45 and 50 years old) directly replied, "How many times have I told you? This problem is not our responsibility, nor can we solve it by coming forward. This is the quality problem of the developer, or you can find the design unit of the urban construction department or the community, which has nothing to do with us. " This set of perfect, flowing "prevarication" words made the owners speechless. After several disputes, the property manager shouted loudly: "We don't serve, you have to pay."

What's the matter, the property said it couldn't be solved? Refers to Wen Jun specially learned that the situation is like this:

This community is full of high-rise residential buildings, and the building mode is corridor, which connects every owner and the elevator exit. However, in winter, there will be problems in the corridor, especially when it is windy and rainy, heavy rain/snow will directly fall on the corridor ground, which will eventually lead to the freezing of the corridor ground, which will bring risks to the owner's travel and often lead to people falling down.

Therefore, the owners have repeatedly reflected this problem to the property and asked the property company to solve it. However, the property company said that this is "a problem of apartment design for real estate developers, and developers need to be found". If the owner looks for a property next time, the property will say, "This should be the deficiency of the residential design unit, and we should find a residential design institute to redesign it." The reality is that this community has been delivered for 7-8 years, and the developer has declared bankruptcy. The property has pushed these things to the developers, which is obviously a diversion.

In the end, buyers and owners can only reluctantly pick up the only "Fang Shangjian" in their hands to deal with it-refusing to pay the property fee. The owner said that "when the property company does this, it will start to pay the property fee." So there was the scene mentioned above.

The above situation, it is estimated that more than 80% of the community may occur, and some community owners have even become commonplace. Therefore, in recent years, the voice of canceling the property has become louder and louder.

Back to the theme of the article, we are not talking about whether to cancel the property, but whether to cancel the property fee for vacant houses. As we all know, there is a surplus of housing in China. Wang Shi, a real estate tycoon, once bluntly said that the real estate surplus has become a fact. Wang Shi believes that real estate will become worthless. In the future, a young couple will inherit at least five properties from their parents, so Wang Shi advised young people not to buy a house.

The research group of the central bank also published a report on the housing assets of urban families in the financial sector. The data shows that the property ownership rate of urban families is over 96%, and the average family property holdings reach 1.5 sets. In ordinary families, the proportion of real estate is over 70%. Why do most people still feel that they can't afford it when there is a surplus of real estate? The key is that these houses have been bought by real estate speculators and are idle.

In the field of economics, there is a classic "28 rule" (20% people have 80% wealth, 80% people only have 20% wealth), and the same is true in the matter of buying a house. Most of the properties were actually bought by a few people, and no one lived for a long time, so that the house was idle and wasted for a long time. Because there is no property tax and vacancy tax, the cost of idle property is very low.

With the real estate entering a stable period, a new problem is facing real estate speculators: the appreciation of real estate is weakened, but the cost is increasing rapidly (for example, with the arrival of real estate tax, the property fee is rising gradually). Therefore, many property buyers said that if their houses don't live, they don't have to pay property fees.

Vacant houses will all "cancel property fees"? The new rules are coming. From 2022 onwards, all will be collected in the future. Many people are wondering whether the property that has been vacant for a long time should pay the property fee. Many owners said that they had never lived in their houses for 3-5 times a year or rented them out. They don't have any assets in this community except the house, and they won't produce domestic garbage, and they won't pollute the community environment. Therefore, the property cleaning of the community and the cleaning of the public corridor area have nothing to do with themselves, and they have never used them. Therefore, from the perspective of "power and"

This point is explained in detail in the new civil code. In Article 944 of the Civil Code, it is described that "if the property management company and service personnel provide residential property services according to the agreement, the owner shall not refuse to pay the property fee on the grounds that I have not enjoyed the service." This gives "vacant house owners" a reassurance, that is to say, even if the house is idle, then the property fee can not be less.

The new regulations also clarify that in the process of collecting property fees, the property should be carried out reasonably, especially when water, electricity and gas are cut off. This point, whether it is the owner or the property manager, should be known in advance.