Parking spaces in a residential area in Changsha are only for sale, not for rent. Is this behavior a overlord clause?

The underground parking spaces in a residential area in Changsha are only sold but not rented, and the price is unbearable for the owners, which has caused heated discussion on the Internet. Some netizens think that this kind of community forces owners to buy parking spaces in disguise, which belongs to the overlord clause. But in fact, according to the provisions of the Property Law, the ownership of the parking space in this underground garage belongs to the developer, and it is not the overlord clause to sell only without renting. However, this behavior of developers will indeed lead to social contradictions, that is to say, the developer's approach is not authentic.

First, it is not strictly an overlord clause to sell only without renting.

In terms of parking spaces, the Property Law has relevant provisions: the exclusive property parking spaces that have not been allocated as * * * construction area belong to the developers, and the developers have the right to sell or rent them. In other words, the parking space is the property of the developer. Developers, whether selling or renting parking spaces, all belong to their own rights and interests. Therefore, it is not illegal for developers to only sell parking spaces without renting them, and it does not belong to the overlord clause. Of course, if the owner has special instructions on the parking space when buying a house, such as the contract that the owner can rent the parking space in the underground garage, this situation will be another story.

Second, although it is not the overlord clause, it is not authentic.

For developers, this situation of only selling and not selling is not illegal, but it is easy to cause social contradictions. Because with the improvement of people's living conditions, almost every household has a car, so parking spaces are just needed for many car owners. After all, buying a car is to facilitate your life. If parking causes more inconvenience to yourself, the owner will naturally be very unhappy. In addition, when developers are building a residential area, the underground parking garage itself belongs to the supporting facilities of the house. Although the ownership belongs to the developer, it is obviously not authentic for the developer to do so, which will give people a feeling of deliberately embarrassing the owner in order to make money.

Generally speaking, the practice of developers only selling without renting is not a overlord clause, but it is very unusual.