Job Recruitment Website - Property management - I didn't expect you to be such a Toyota.

I didn't expect you to be such a Toyota.

You may not believe it. According to the crash test results of China Insurance Research Institute, the previously rumored "unsafe Japanese cars" basically got high marks this time, while the legendary safer German and American cars were quite out of line.

The following are the top ten vehicles with the best crash test results in 20 19.

First place: Toyota Ji Ze

In the past, Toyota received the most criticism that its thin skin was unsafe, but Toyota Yize scored the highest among all the tested models (20 18 -20 19), and it is still an unsafe small SUV in most people's minds. This is mainly due to the all-round improvement of safety, design and control by Toyota TNGA architecture. Personally, it is the most advanced automobile architecture in the world today.

Second place: Toyota Lei Ling

The second place is still the Toyota model. Lei Ling got the highest G evaluation in terms of crew, amateur and auxiliary safety, and was also ahead of its peers in terms of maintenance economy. Besides, if consumers want to buy a hybrid car without spending too much money, they should choose Lei Ling.

Third place: BMW brand new 3 series

BMW's new 3 Series has the highest G rating in terms of occupant, amateur and auxiliary safety, but limited by the status of luxury brands, its performance in maintenance economy is relatively poor. As a representative of BMW, even a representative of medium-sized sports cars, the BMW 3 Series has made car owners feel at ease.

Fourth place: Volvo XC60

The Volvo brand, which has always focused on safety, is a routine operation in the top ten, which is not unexpected or unexpected. To our credit, Volvo volunteered to send XC60 for the 25% offset crash test and evaluation of the occupant system, and obtained the highest G evaluation. In addition, Volvo XC60 offers a large discount, and its comprehensive cost performance far exceeds that of competing products such as Audi Q5L. With the launch of the 2020 model, the original * * * vibration phenomenon has not been responded by the owner. Those who plan to buy a luxury car can pay attention to it.

Fifth place: Toyota Asian Dragon

Toyota and Asian Dragon are also products of TNGA framework. Except for the poor performance of low-speed collision, the performance of other test items is the highest G evaluation. In addition, if it weren't for the limited production capacity of Asian Dragon, the medium-sized car market might become its back garden.

Sixth place: Toyota Camry

Still Toyota. In other words, even with the lowest Camry, the airbag is full and worthy of good grades. Perhaps this is why Toyota rarely offers discounts.

Seventh place: link 0 1

Kelin 0 1 Based on CMA architecture jointly developed by Geely and Volvo * * *, backed by big trees, it has unique advantages in safety. However, Geely Xingyue, which is also built based on CMA architecture, has a big gap between the collision test results and Linke 0 1. Sure enough, a penny is worth a penny, and there is a reason why the collar is more expensive than Geely.

Eighth place: Nissan Teana

Teana also got the result of 3G crash test, and its overall performance was excellent. In addition, the variable compression ratio technology adopted by Teana 2.0T engine can realize the switching of engine compression ratio from 8: 1 (high performance) to 14: 1 (high efficiency), and realize the same level of power and fuel consumption. Teana's engine is far more commendable than its safety.

Ninth place: BYD Tang

BYD Tang Fuel Edition was rated as good except for the side collision, and the collision in other positions was excellent in terms of safety. As an autonomous SUV with more than 654.38+ 10,000 yuan, this performance is not easy. But Mungo wanted to see how BYD, the leader of China New Energy, would perform in the crash test.

Tenth place: WEY? VV5

The design of VV5 is solid, which can give people a sense of security at first sight, but it is not illusory with its achievements. Similarly, WEY is more expensive than Harvard for a reason. Instead of using a high-level standard to fool money.

Image | Source Network

Edit | overflow tail packet

This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.