Job Recruitment Website - Property management - The woman was pushed and kicked by the property manager and complained after the property was approved. What happened afterwards?

The woman was pushed and kicked by the property manager and complained after the property was approved. What happened afterwards?

In a residential area in Nanning, Guangxi, a woman was suddenly pushed by a man in a white shirt behind her. After she was pushed to the ground, the man kicked her several feet. The woman is a community owner and the man is a property worker. The cause of the conflict is that the owner of the community came to find the property because his water meter was demolished. In the process, the two sides had a dispute, which turned from a verbal quarrel to a physical conflict.

After the video of the incident spread on the Internet, the property was criticized by netizens. Netizens think that the property is too arrogant to beat a woman without saying anything, which should be severely punished. And the property also has something to say: it is the owner who maliciously defaulted on the property fee for two years!

It is understood that there is indeed a situation in which the owner fails to pay the water and electricity bills on time, and the property immediately retaliates and threatens the owner by dismantling the water meters of ten households. Rationally speaking, from the legal point of view, both the property and the owner have done something wrong. First of all, as a community owner, it is obliged to pay for the services provided by the property company. Stopping paying property fees is not a legal way to protect rights. If you feel that the service provided by the property management company is not in place or you are not satisfied with its service attitude, you can choose to complain or other ways, but you should not default on the property fee.

The property is also full, and the way to deal with the problem is very inappropriate. If the owner fails to pay the fee on time, he should communicate at home, understand the owner's dissatisfaction and demands, find rectification measures, and improve and solve the problem through legal channels. Moreover, the property has no right to cut off water and electricity at all, and their practices infringe on the rights and interests of the owners. As for hitting people, that's even more ridiculous. From ordinary disputes to personal injuries, it shows that their attitude is quite cruel and unreasonable.

In China, conflicts between property and owners are endless. These two parties are like a mother-in-law relationship. We can be mutually beneficial, but we always quarrel. The reason for this phenomenon is, on the one hand, the interest relationship between property and developers, and the property company is selected by developers. From the contractual relationship, the property company and the developer are subordinate in the contractual sense. As the first original owner of the community, the developer signed a contract with the property company and entrusted the property company to serve the community owners. Once you accept a property company, it is a long-term cooperation, but the developer does not live in the community, so you will not put the service quality of the property company in the first place.

On the other hand, there are gaps in the laws regulating property and owners' behavior. For the owners, there are no exact laws and regulations to classify the service items of property management companies, nor can they require their service quality and management scope. For property companies, owners have complaint channels, but there are no exact laws and regulations to complain to owners who do not pay property fees on time. When there is a contradiction between the owner and the property, they all say that "the public is right and the woman is right." Even if one party obviously goes too far, there is no way to punish and warn. It is not easy to change property companies, and newcomers may not be able to do it well. If individual owners make bigger mistakes, the property management company can't force them to move out, and the role of alarm is limited.

But in any case, escape and violence are not the means to solve the problem. As the owner, we should understand the work of the property management company, communicate in time when the service of the property management company is not in place, or complain, take legal channels and pay the property fee on time. As a property company, we should also reflect on it in time. Only by improving the service quality can the owners be willing to pay the property fees on time. Violent means can not only solve the problem, but also cause a stronger rebound of community owners.

What do you think of this matter? Leave a message in the comment area and tell me your opinion.