The property was suddenly sprayed with green paint on the lawn and was questioned. Why are the owners getting more and more angry after the property explanation?

Now that the house price is getting higher and higher, I finally spent a lot of savings. Besides, I bought a house with a bank loan. I thought how beautiful the environment was, but I didn't expect all the lawns in the community to die. In order to cope with the embarrassment of lawn yellowing, it is worth spraying green on the lawn. Paint? This kind of operation seems to exist only in funny videos, but it really happened in reality. The owner was very angry, but the property said it was a fungicide, which also had the effect of adding color, but because some owners felt unsafe, they uprooted all the lawns! Can the master not be angry when he hears this? The yellowing of the lawn at least proves that there is a lawn. What is direct eradication now? Property management is too capricious!

First of all, the incident happened in Xi City, Shaanxi Province. On August 23, an owner publicly exposed on the Internet that the lawn of a residential area in the area was obviously yellow. The property sprayed green liquid on the lawn, which was suspected to be paint, because the lawn turned green after spraying, but this move was widely questioned by the owners. Will this thing cause environmental pollution and be harmful to human body? After understanding the situation, the property said that it was a bactericidal drug to prevent the lawn from getting sick, and it also had a coloring effect, but the owner felt unsafe and uprooted the lawn.

On the one hand, the yellow lawn in the community may be the cause of dehydration in summer, on the other hand, it is indeed possible to encounter germs and pests. In fact, if the property is based on the purpose of disinfecting the lawn, it should be explained to the owner clearly. It was a good thing, but because of the lack of communication, it turned a good thing into a bad thing, which made the host more dissatisfied. It is not excluded that the property is angry with the owner.

Second, the essence of the incident is that the property is the housekeeper of the owner. The maintenance of environmental sanitation mainly depends on the property, but the property must see its own position clearly. All the property in the community belongs to the owner, not the property. The property itself has no right to deal with the lawn in the community. Even if the lawn is removed, it must be approved by most owners or owners' committees. Otherwise, how can you be willful?

From this, I think that greening, sanitation and security in many communities are outsourced. Euphemistically called a property management company, it charges a first-class management property management fee, but it is actually a leather bag company. Non-flat management leads to the lack of work in all aspects of the community, which leads to the intensification of contradictions between owners and property companies and the worsening environment.

Third, the thinking brought by the incident. Therefore, it was originally a simple lawn nutrition greening agent, which was mistaken for paint by the owner. It is pollution-free and can effectively spray the injured lawn. However, due to the willfulness of the property and the lack of effective communication, the lawn was directly eradicated. Whose expense is this? In the property fee budget, it is also the money paid by the owner, which really should not be. Residential property can only exist for a long time from the perspective of the owner. Although some owners are unreasonable and don't pay property fees at will, they are a minority after all. Good property must be conscientious property.

what do you think? Welcome to leave a message below to discuss!