The original property was withdrawn and the new property did not come in.

Property confuses the difference between the right to use and ownership, and should bear tort liability!

Since the terrace belongs to the maintenance platform, the ownership naturally belongs to all owners. However, the layout of the terrace can only be accessed through the interior of one owner, which actually determines that the right to use the terrace belongs to the residents. But the tenant only has the right to use, and cannot change the use and structure of the terrace.

Just like renting a house. The property right of the rented house naturally belongs to the owner recorded in the property right registration certificate, but the lessee naturally enjoys the right to use the house during the legal lease period. During the period of renting, as the landlord of the owner, you can't enter the rented house at will. If the landlord enters at will without the tenant's consent, the losses and violations caused by the tenant should naturally be borne by the landlord.

The nature of the terrace is similar!

Not to mention that the property is not the owner, even other residents in the building have no right to enter the exclusive balcony at will.

In other words, if someone falls into the balcony from the roof, it is completely reasonable and legal for residents to take compulsory measures as "thieves"! This is like the landlord entering the rented house without telling the tenant or asking for permission. The tenant mistakenly thinks that he is a burglar and knocks him unconscious. What do you think JC will do? If the tenant says something is missing, I'm afraid the landlord will not only be beaten in vain, but also compensate for the losses!