The property company has the second-class property qualification according to law, but when undertaking the property project, it signed the property management entrustment contract in the name of the

The property company has the second-class property qualification according to law, but when undertaking the property project, it signed the property management entrustment contract in the name of the branch company, but the branch company did not. Many lawyers give wrong answers to such questions. The branch company cannot sign the property service contract, and the contract is invalid.

According to Article 32, enterprises engaged in property management activities shall have independent legal personality. (Article 32 for short)

Article 153 stipulates that a civil juristic act that violates the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations is invalid.

Combined with the above two, it can be seen that the act of signing a property service contract by a branch company is invalid. That is to say, in the field of property services, the branch is bound by 32 articles as having no capacity for civil conduct, so the signing of the contract is invalid;

Many lawyers on the internet just copy the law and don't think about it at all.

By the way (ordinary people don't need to read it below), if someone says this is a management standard, I'll tell you two more points: 1. Contracts that violate management norms may not be valid; 2. As the main body of a contract, signing a contract is a legal act, not a factual act; Can you understand?