Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Take-away bad reviews

Take-away bad reviews

The cause of the incident is that Kobayashi and Xiaoxiao, who live in the "China Railway Lijing Shuxiang" community in Wenjiang, ordered three dishes at a "village tofu dry rice" near their residence through "Hungry". Originally, the meals in 40 yuan only cost 28 yuan because of the discount. After more than an hour, the food delivered was not good in appearance and taste. So Kobayashi ordered a bad review on the ordering website. In the afternoon, the fast food restaurant called and asked Xiao Lin to change his comments. He threatened: "I can't do it and you can't live!" " He also threatened to go to Xiao Lin's address to make trouble, and then he stared at him and made trouble at his place of work.

Kobayashi was going to delete the evaluation online, but how did he know that he couldn't be eliminated? After finding that it cannot be changed, let the other party show it to the online ordering platform. As a result, the store asked Xiaolin to place an order again and write a favorable comment. Kobayashi was dissatisfied with the quarrel between the two sides, and the store also said that it would teach Kobayashi immediately.

Soon Xiaolin received a phone call from the store, and the merchant asked him to open the door. Then Xiao Lin heard a quick knock at the door. Kobayashi immediately informed the doorman that the door lock had been knocked open with a big hole! Kobayashi changed their locks overnight and finally moved out of the rental house where he had lived for half a year.

In the early morning of the 27th, Kobayashi's mobile phone received a text message from a strange number. In the text message, the other party pretended to be a restaurant staff member, hoping to roll with the punches. Afterwards, Kobayashi and his friends saw two men on the monitoring of the property management center of the community. Kobayashi, one of them, also saw it when he accompanied the police to the restaurant. "The restaurant staff only said that they had been there and did not admit to cutting the door." On the afternoon of the 29th, the staff of the residential property center revealed that there was only monitoring in the elevator and before entering the elevator, and there was no video monitoring of door cutting. At present, two men involved have been blacklisted in the community.

In the end, the "hungry" party immediately contacted the merchants and users after receiving the complaints from users and handed them over to the local police for handling. After coordination by the police, the two sides have reached a settlement.

Not long ago, the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee conducted an investigation.

Nine take-out platforms 100 restaurants found that more than 80% of the restaurant licenses did not match the actual situation.

As early as 20 13 and 12, Oriental Morning Post published "Investigation of Offline Stores of Takeaway Websites: Food".