Is property a "master" or a "servant"

Property is paid by the owner to serve himself, so it should be handled according to the needs of the owner. But the property we often see is not like this. Many owners even said that the property seemed to be invited as an owner. People say that property is like a "master", which makes sense.

First, the property did not negotiate with the owners and made decisions without authorization.

For example, the rise of property fees, such as the formulation of management plans, are closely related to the interests of the owners, and the property can actually skip the owners' self-assertion.

This is obviously trampling on the "sovereignty" of the owners.

Second, the collection of property fees is active, and the owners change the law to shirk their responsibilities.

When collecting property fees, the property often knocks on the door in advance. But the owner's car was lost or scratched, and the property tried to pass the buck.

Property only collects money and does not assume responsibility. This is clearly, the property ""stands in a pit and does not shit. "

Third, the property is very pleasant to listen to, but it rarely serves the owners sincerely.

There are many wonderful rules about private property. They always say that it is for the safety of the community and the interests of the owners. For example, take-out is not allowed in the community, and foreign electric vehicles are not allowed to enter the community. The owner was forced to go to the door of the community to get food for himself, which forced the owner to pick up relatives and friends who came to visit by electric car at the door of the community.

Many netizens are very unhappy to ask, is this for the sake of the owners, and is this to provide convenience for the owners? Some people questioned that the community was closed. Is this a community or a prison?

At present, the reputation of this property in China is quite bad. Many netizens feel uncomfortable when they mention the property business, and they will talk endlessly about the property, but they show all kinds of helplessness.

It is said that the property owners pay for their own services. In fact, many properties are uninvited or "designated". Even if the owner is not satisfied, it is difficult for you to "dismiss" the property.

Most of the residential areas of the property have "owners' committees". However, although some "owners' committees" are tit-for-tat with the property in order to safeguard the interests of the owners, they rarely win the property; Some "owners' committees" are weak and incompetent, which has become a decoration; Some of the main members of the "owners' committee" were actually bought by the property and became "accomplices" of the property. ...

Therefore, some people have questioned whether China real estate is a master or a servant.

This is not only something worth pondering, but also a very interesting thing.

In this regard, a new media received tens of thousands of posts. Some netizens believe that the property is doing things that harm others and benefit themselves in the name of "serving the owners". The netizens who participated in the thread almost agreed that the property is self-serving and harmful to others, which is a cancer and must be eradicated!