Do you think the property should be responsible for the first-instance judgment of the TV series "The Woman Sleeping in My Bed"?

The heroine of the TV series sleeps in my bed? The case was decided in the first instance, and I think the property should bear the responsibility. Ms. Lin, who lives in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, bought a big villa in her hometown a few years ago. The villa has five floors, four floors above ground and one underground, and the decoration is very luxurious. Because Ms. Lin is not in her hometown when she goes to work, she has never returned home to live after the renovation. What Ms. Lin didn't expect was that in 20 19, when Ms. Lin was watching a TV series at home, she suddenly found that the villa where the heroine lived was exactly the same as her own. Ms. Lin was surprised that she had never signed a contract with the crew. Without her knowledge, hundreds of people in her villa staged the plot of the relationship between men and women-especially the relationship between men and women, beating and killing. Ms. Lin was very angry after learning this situation. As the saying goes? The wind can rain, but the king can't? In this way, my home was occupied by others, and my home really has no privacy at all.

The negotiation was fruitless. Ms. Lin found that there were two TV crews in her villa, namely "My Daughter and I" and "About Love". After this wonderful thing happened to Ms. Lin, first of all, she hurried back to the villa to check the situation. Ms. Lin found that some things in her villa were missing and some furniture was worn out. Ms. Lin is very angry. First, she found the property that kept the key. The property did not admit it at first, but when Ms. Lin showed the screenshot of the TV series to the property, the owner began to prevaricate. In the face of Ms. Lin's complaint, the property has always been reluctant to talk directly with Ms. Lin. Ms. Lin has no choice but to talk to the producer of the TV series. Ningbo film and television? There is also a broadcasting platform? Iqiyi? Letters from lawyers were sent, but they were all rejected.

Both the property and the crew are responsible. Ms. Lin took the crew and the property to court in a rage. In court, the crew said that they were wronged because they found the property in the community. The property said that Ms. Lin's villa belongs to the community? Model house? That's why I stayed in the villa for 7 days and paid 60 thousand yuan for the venue, so the lawyer thinks the crew should belong to it? A third person in good faith? Ms. Lin's request for compensation from the crew and the withdrawal of the TV series is absurd. After the relevant investigation, the court held that although the crew claimed not to know, Ms. Lin's villa did suffer losses due to the filming of the crew, so the crew was sentenced to compensate Ms. Lin for 200,000 yuan each, and the property company was jointly and severally liable.

The behavior of the property company is indeed a bit excessive. Without the owner's knowledge, it is no wonder that the court ruled that the property should bear joint liability for infringement.