Do security guards and owners have custody contracts? Property companies have the right to require security guards to lose their vehicles during the probation period.

According to China's labor law, the employer is responsible for compensation for the consequences caused by security dereliction of duty. Security is a duty behavior, and the subject of compensation is the property company, which has nothing to do with whether the security guard is on probation. Property companies can punish security guards according to the internal regulations of enterprises. If the employer does not sign a vehicle management contract with you, the security guard cannot fully compensate, and the property management company should fully compensate. Security guards and owners can't have a property custody contract. In the practice of property management, motor vehicle property companies generally only provide parking spaces, and generally do not sign vehicle storage agreements with car owners. If this is the case, the parking price of owners will more than double, and some property companies will purchase commercial insurance to pass on business risks. There are two kinds of management of non-motor vehicles. One is that paid parking includes storage fees, and non-motor vehicles must pay compensation when parked at the designated location of the property company. Property companies that do not charge for non-motor vehicles will not be compensated, whether they stop at the designated or unspecified location of the property company. The judicial interpretation of China's Supreme Court clearly stipulates that, in short, security guards have no obligation to compensate the owners for the losses caused by dereliction of duty, and property companies have the responsibility to compensate the owners for the losses. The security guard should accept the punishment of the property management company, and can't ask the security guard to compensate the owner for the loss. The value of the security guard being punished is far lower than the value of the property company's compensation for the owner's losses. Property companies can't put all business risks on security. The leadership of this property company has a very poor ability to take operational risks. Instead of looking for loopholes in management, the garbage property company wants to pass on all the business risks to the security guards.