Is it an obligation to inform the property by posting the notice of rectification of the pile in the corridor?

Yes, this practice has fulfilled the obligation to inform.

According to the deployment of the public security department on strengthening fire control and public security prevention, in order to create a beautiful, comfortable and safe living environment for you and your neighbors, please do not pile up sundries (electric cars, shoe racks, domestic garbage, etc.). ) in the corridor and corridor distribution room, so as not to cause fire safety hazards. Articles and sundries piled up in the corridor are an infringement on the legitimate rights and interests of others. Once an accident is caused, the owner will bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

At the same time, there are also related cases to prove this behavior.

After returning home, Ms. Jiang from Shunyi found that the cabinet at her door was missing. Later, she heard that the cabinet was moved to the boiler room by the property, and it was fruitless to look for it. So she sued the residential property to the court and demanded compensation for the loss of cabinets and shoes, totaling more than 5,000 yuan.

Recently, Shunyi court heard the case and finally rejected Ms. Jiang's claim.

It was found through trial that the defendant's property had twice issued a notice to clean up the debris in the corridor and posted it on the bulletin board at the door of each unit. The notice requires that from now on, before the specified date, the debris in the residential corridor and public areas will be cleaned up. If it is not cleaned up within the time limit, it will be regarded as ownerless.

In this case, the plaintiff, Ms. Jiang, placed the cupboard in the corridor of public * * * *, which itself had fire safety hazards. After the defendant's property was cleared, she still placed her cabinet in the public corridor. Ms. Jiang failed to prove that her cabinet was lost in the residential property, so Ms. Jiang's request for property compensation for her property loss was not supported by the court.