How to determine the property management fee system and contract responsibility system in the property management contract? Which is more reasonable? Or under what circumstances to determine one of th

How to determine the property management fee system and contract responsibility system in the property management contract? Which is more reasonable? Or under what circumstances to determine one of the two ways? Under the reward system Contract system means that the owner pays a fixed property service fee to the property management enterprise, and the profit and loss are enjoyed or borne by the property management enterprise. If the contract system is implemented, the composition of property service fee includes property service cost, fixed taxes and fees and the profits of property management enterprises. "

"Remuneration system refers to the payment of remuneration to the property management enterprise in accordance with the agreed proportion or amount in the property service funds received in advance, and the rest is used for the expenses agreed in the property service contract, and the balance or insufficient part shall be enjoyed or borne by the owner. If the remuneration system is implemented, the property service funds received in advance include property service expenditure and property management enterprise remuneration ". From the perspective of marketing, the pricing model of contract system is essentially market pricing, and the pricing model of reward system is essentially cost pricing.

The core advantages of the gratuity system are as follows:

1, financial transparency, the owner can directly supervise the use of funds.

2. It is conducive to protecting the property management industry from growing in the bud.

The core advantages of the contract system are as follows:

1. Strengthen cost awareness and improve enterprise viability.

2. It is conducive to improving the quality of employees and promoting the development of the industry.

3. Save regulatory costs and improve decision-making and service efficiency.

Conclusion:

1, the reward system can help the property management enterprises in the initial stage to grow and develop.

China has a vast territory, and its economic development is extremely unbalanced, so is the development of property management. Therefore, in areas where the market economy is developing slowly and the property management started late, the contract gratuity system can be adopted, which is easy for the owners to accept, suitable for the foothold of property management enterprises and industries, and smoothly pass through the childish period of the industry.

2. The contract responsibility system is applicable to areas with a high degree of marketization and a certain foundation for property management.

The contract responsibility system is the product of the market development to a certain stage, and its advantages are far greater than the reward system, especially in promoting the development of enterprises and industries that have entered a rapid growth period. In fact, in Shenzhen, where property management first appeared, although the current charging method is also called commission (gratuity) system, there is also a cloak of commission (gratuity) system on the surface, such as regularly publishing the details of income and expenditure to answer the owners' income and expenditure questions, and the owners can hire professional institutions to audit the annual budget and final accounts of property service funds and the income and expenditure of property service funds. , but its essence is no longer the connotation of the commission (contract gratuity) system. First, in the actual operation of supervision, the vast majority of owners/industry committees do not really fulfill their supervision responsibilities, but mainly rely on the brand reputation of property management companies to replace cumbersome and expensive supervision procedures. Even if some industry committees implemented the supervision procedures, they failed to achieve the purpose of process control after consuming extremely huge costs, which eventually led to both losses. Second, at present, no enterprise can really price according to the cost, and basically adopts the contract system, that is, the market price. The most typical case is that the overall service price of high-rise residential buildings in Shenzhen was relatively high at the beginning. When some enterprises took the lead in reducing prices, other enterprises successively reduced the charging prices to the same or similar level. The service charge price of multi-storey houses is generally low, and it is basically unprofitable or even losing money for enterprises to provide such services. However, few enterprises raise the charging price alone or the owners make up for the losses. This performance is almost entirely due to the spontaneous adjustment of the market price mechanism. Therefore, when the degree of marketization is high and the property management has a certain foundation, the contract system should be adopted.

With the development of the property management industry and the improvement of the maturity of the property management market, the advantages of the contract responsibility system will become more and more obvious. The contract responsibility system uses the invisible hand of the market to meet the needs of the owners, protect the advanced and eliminate the fittest, and urge the property management enterprises to quickly improve their own management level, thus rapidly improving the overall level of the industry.