20 10 central government's major principles and policies on agriculture, agriculture-related laws and regulations, current politics and other related knowledge? thank you

20 20 10 the main points of the first document

This year's No.1 document, Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Strengthening the Overall Planning of Urban and Rural Development and Further Consolidating the Foundation of Agricultural and Rural Development, is the seventh consecutive document with the theme of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers" and the twelfth document with the theme of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers" since the reform and opening up. .

The document is divided into five categories and 27 articles, two of which involve urban and rural issues. The five categories are: first, improve the policy system of strengthening agriculture and benefiting farmers, and promote the allocation of resource elements to rural areas; The second is to improve the level of modern agricultural equipment and promote the transformation of agricultural development mode; Third, speed up the improvement of rural people's livelihood and narrow the gap between urban and rural public utilities; Fourth, promote urban and rural reform as a whole and enhance the vitality of agricultural and rural development; Fourth, promote urban and rural reform as a whole and enhance the vitality of agricultural and rural development; Five, strengthen the construction of rural grass-roots organizations, and consolidate the party's ruling foundation in rural areas.

The main content of article 27 is: 1. Continue to increase state investment in agriculture and rural areas; 2. Improve the agricultural subsidy system and market regulation mechanism; 3. Improve the quality and level of rural financial services; 4. Actively guide social resources to invest in agriculture and rural areas; 5. Vigorously explore the rural market; 6. The production of bulk agricultural products such as grain has developed steadily; 7. Promote standardized production of vegetable basket products; 8. Focus on building water conservancy infrastructure; 9. Vigorously build high-standard farmland; 10. improve the ability of agricultural science and technology innovation and popularization; 1 1. Improve the agricultural product market system; 12. Build an ecological security barrier; 13. Strive to promote farmers' employment and entrepreneurship; 14. Improve the development level of rural education, health and cultural undertakings; 15. improve the level of rural social security; 16. strengthen the construction of rural water circuit gas room; 17. continue to do a good job in poverty alleviation and development; 18. stabilize and improve the basic rural management system; 19. Promote the reform of rural land management system in an orderly manner; 20 efforts to improve the degree of organization of agricultural production and management; 2 1. Actively promote forestry reform; 22. Continue to deepen comprehensive rural reform; 23. Institutional innovation to promote urbanization: 24. Improve the level of agricultural opening up; 25. Strengthen and improve the Party building at the grassroots level in rural areas; 26. Further improve the rural grassroots governance mechanism in line with national conditions; 27. Effectively maintain social stability in rural areas.

This year's No.1 document has many new highlights, and the following 20 items are summarized:

1. Will the funds benefiting farmers continue to increase to more than 800 billion?

The document stipulates: continue to increase state investment in agriculture and rural areas. In accordance with the requirements of continuous increase in the total amount and steady increase in the proportion, we will continue to increase investment in agriculture, rural areas and farmers.

The first article of document No.1 is to increase investment in agriculture and rural areas, which is also the top priority of the whole work of agriculture, rural areas and farmers. Because only real investment can give farmers real benefits, and the work will not be carried out by shouting slogans. In 20 10, the central government will further increase its investment in agriculture and rural areas, and the central government's budget for supporting agriculture may reach 700 billion yuan, which is higher than the budget level of 600 billion yuan last year. In terms of quantity, investment in agriculture has been increasing in recent years. In 2006, the central government invested 339.7 billion yuan in agriculture, rural areas and farmers, and on this basis, it increased by 80 billion yuan in 2007, exceeding10 billion yuan in 2008, and invested 71610 billion yuan in 2009, an increase of/kl over 2008. According to the law of increasing 1000 billion in the past year, the funds for benefiting farmers should reach more than 800 billion this year.

It is conducive to increasing investment in benefiting farmers. The focus of the next step should be how to improve the actual use effect of funds benefiting farmers and let farmers really get benefits. It is necessary to fundamentally transform the selection, construction, implementation and acceptance of existing projects that benefit farmers. At present, there are many chaos in the project of benefiting farmers, including just "running the department to make money", but the performance appraisal of the project is just a formality, and self-construction, self-inspection and self-inspection are very irregular. When I go to many places, I dare not ask for money easily, for fear that I will be investigated if I can't use it well. When can the system of benefiting farmers be truly improved?

2. More varieties of agricultural products can also enjoy subsidized meals.

The document stipulates that direct subsidies should be given to grain farmers. Increase subsidies for improved varieties, expand the scope of potato subsidies, start subsidies for improved varieties of green trees, and implement pilot subsidies for improved varieties of peanuts. Further increase subsidies for the purchase of agricultural machinery and tools, expand the types of subsidies, and include animal husbandry, forestry, drought-resistant and water-saving machinery and equipment into the scope of subsidies. Implement and improve the dynamic adjustment mechanism of comprehensive agricultural subsidies. In accordance with the principle of fixed stock and incremental tilt, new agricultural subsidies are appropriately tilted to large grain growers and farmers' professional cooperatives. Gradually improve the agricultural subsidy policies suitable for pastoral areas, forest areas and reclamation areas. It is stipulated that subsidy funds are not allowed to be used to deduct farmers' expenses. Timely adopt temporary purchasing and storage policies such as corn, soybeans and rapeseed, support enterprises to participate in purchasing and storage, and make plans for cotton, sugar and pork control.

In the past, only a few food crops such as wheat, rice and corn were subsidized. There are too many people eating this big meal, and everyone wants to share it. No, it has really increased a lot this year, including subsidies for improved varieties of peanuts and potatoes and subsidies for improved varieties of green trees. Although agricultural machinery subsidies have been criticized, they have increased in quantity and types this year, including animal husbandry, forestry, drought-resistant and water-saving machinery and equipment. It seems that the life of the county agricultural machinery director is better, and the mouth of agricultural machinery manufacturers will not be closed. Just farmers. Is it cost-effective to buy an agricultural machinery for every household? I really need to calculate an account. Japanese farmers are highly mechanized, and almost every household has complete sets of agricultural machinery and equipment. The final outcome can only be "high-priced agriculture." Many farmers in our country have also fallen into confusion. If you don't buy it, you always have to pay for using other people's agricultural machinery. Buy it. Except during the busy farming season, these devices are idle for most of the year. Now it is stipulated that you can only get subsidies for agricultural machinery if you buy it. Many people are hesitant to let people who buy super-large agricultural machinery get huge subsidies. If so, limited subsidies can really "make up the rich but not the poor". Those who can afford large machinery should not be poor and middle peasants. Why should they make up for it? What is the reason? According to the basic principle, financial money should supplement the poor, not the rich.

The urbanization reform is about to set sail, the "two-wheeled vehicle" is about to start, and the dream of migrant workers staying in the city forever is about to come true?

The document stipulates: actively and steadily promote urbanization and improve the level of urban planning and development quality. At present, we should focus on strengthening the development of small and medium-sized towns. Promote qualified agricultural transfer population to settle in cities and towns and enjoy the same rights and interests as local urban residents. Encourage qualified cities to gradually bring migrant workers who have stable jobs and have lived in cities for a certain number of years into the urban housing security system. Focus on solving the problem of new generation of migrant workers. Vigorously develop the county economy, improve the comprehensive carrying capacity of cities and towns, absorb rural population, and accelerate the agglomeration of small towns. Improve supporting policies such as finance, taxation, investment and financing, and accelerate the development of small towns. We will continue to promote the pilot reform of strengthening counties by expanding power, promote the reform of the town administrative system with rapid economic development and strong population absorption capacity, and decentralize management authority.

How to relax the restrictions on household registration system and promote urbanization reform is one of the biggest highlights of Document No.1 this year. In fact, as early as the end of last year, the National Economic Work Conference and the Rural Work Conference had already sent clear signals. Only this year's No.1 document made a more specific explanation. What problems should be paid attention to in the process of promoting urbanization in China? Document No.1 mainly points out three ideas, one is the general direction of development, the other is the focus, and the other is active and steady, that is, we should focus on strengthening the development of small and medium-sized cities and small towns at present. Actively and steadily promote urbanization and improve the level of urban planning and development quality. Secondly, from a soft point of view, focus on solving the problems of household registration, social security and the new generation of migrant workers; Thirdly, from the institutional point of view, it is required to solve the problems of carrying capacity and industrial support of small towns through various reforms such as finance, taxation, employment and system.

Vigorously developing small and medium-sized towns and turning rural economy into "two-wheel drive", that is, new rural construction and urbanization, is an important strategic shift of China's three rural policies. Form a situation of coordinated development of large, medium and small cities and small towns, benign interaction between urbanization and new rural construction, and strive to achieve coordinated development of agricultural modernization, industrialization and urbanization. The development of small towns should be accelerated, but the phenomenon of rash advance should be avoided, so the document says that the development of urbanization should be actively and steadily promoted.

At present, the income gap between urban and rural residents in China is around 3.3. In 2009, the per capita annual income of farmers reached 5,000 yuan, while that of urban residents was16500 yuan, with a gap of115500 yuan. China's population of 654.38+03 billion, if it increases by one percentage point every year, that is, 654.38+03 million people enter the city, it will boost domestic demand by about 654.38+05 billion; If it is increased by two percentage points, it will boost domestic demand by 300 billion yuan, which does not include the pull of new immigrants on housing and other industries. According to the calculation of a migrant worker with a family of four, for every one percentage point increase in urbanization, 3.25 million families will need housing. Assuming that the minimum area is 90 square meters, and the price per square meter is 2,000 yuan (the house price in the eastern developed areas is more expensive), the housing consumption alone is 585 billion; If it is increased by two percentage points every year, there will be1170 billion housing. Consumption and housing add up to an amazing figure, which will greatly boost China's economy and have great potential.

In fact, there are many problems in the urbanization strategy. For example, whether developed regions are willing to accept new immigrants has become the core issue, and the settlement of the inter-provincial household registration system for migrant workers should be the most difficult bone to chew. How to solve the problem of land property rights in small towns? Can small town land be allowed not to become state-owned? How to avoid housing prices in small and medium-sized cities and towns and how not to be fried into bubbles? In the long run, if the current policy is continued, will it further widen the gap between regions? Wait a minute.

4. Can farmers get loans for building houses?

The document stipulates that rural financial institutions are encouraged to provide consumer credit for farmers to build houses, buy cars and household appliances, and increase credit for setting up farm shops.

It is a great benefit project for farmers to enjoy financial services, especially the construction of big houses, big cars and household appliances. Farmers' housing loan is a great policy breakthrough, and how to describe it is too important. This policy is like Archimedes fulcrum, which can pry up the rural consumer market that has not been pried up in the past. Because 90% of farmers' life investment is spent on building houses, generations of farmers basically rely on accumulation to build houses. If farmers can solve the housing problem through loans, they can have spare money to spend on other things. Urban residents have enjoyed the benefits of mortgage loans for a long time, and they repay some loans every year, hardly eating or drinking, so they don't have to spend all their energy on building houses. Because farmers are subject to rural collective land ownership, their houses cannot be mortgaged, so they are not supported by loans. However, many pilot projects have been carried out in various places, breaking through the policy provisions. After all, for many places, this is a win-win problem. Farmers have solved the problem of building houses, and financial institutions can also have business. However, once there are legal problems, it will be very troublesome to deal with them because there are no relevant provisions in the Property Law and the Land Management Law.

5. We should speed up the pace of the new rural endowment insurance.

The document stipulates: continue to do a good job in the pilot work of the new rural social endowment insurance, and the pace of the pilot can be accelerated where conditions permit.

Since the introduction of the new rural insurance policy last year, it has ended the ancient tradition that farmers have relied on their families for providing for the aged for thousands of years in China, and the state has also provided real money for farmers to enjoy the inclusive old-age service. According to the research of MIT professors, the rural elderly enjoy an inclusive pension, which is of great benefit to the health and study of their grandchildren. In other words, this pension will not only benefit the rural elderly, but also benefit the next generation of the motherland, especially since there are currently 56 million left-behind children in China. This is even more important. Therefore, I have been calling on relevant departments to speed up the coverage of rural old-age insurance. First of all, elderly people who have reached the age of 60 in rural areas should be able to enjoy this kind of inclusive pension in recent years. As for other rural young adults, there is really no need for binding policies. When they figure it out and want to join, let them join. Therefore, the bundling policy in the new rural insurance pilot policy does not need to be enforced.

6. In building the countryside, passengers also go to the countryside.

The document stipulates: seize the opportunity of rapid growth of rural housing construction and sufficient supply of building materials, take supporting farmers to build houses as an important measure to expand domestic demand, take effective measures to promote rural construction, and encourage qualified places to support farmers to build houses according to laws and regulations in various forms. Promote the integration of urban and rural passenger transport.

Building the countryside is a great news, and the Chamber of Commerce of Building Materials Factory is overjoyed. The main reason is that rural housing is eliminated too quickly, almost one in ten years, while ordinary urban housing will live for 40-50 years, although it is less than 70 years. The Japanese are more powerful. Now there are many houses built in the Song Dynasty in Kyoto, not to mention a country with many earthquakes. Houses in Europe and America have also lived for a long time. The reason why the housing in rural areas of China is updated so quickly is abnormal, which has brought huge waste, wasted people and money. There are many reasons, such as short-sighted planning, lagging building materials and so on. It should be a good thing for farmers to use good building materials with long life when building rural areas. But don't make the same rules as home appliances to the countryside, so that farmers can only make up building materials and suppliers. This is terrible. Of course, you can learn from Korea. It is also a good thing that the government only takes materials to build houses for farmers themselves. If you really want to make up, it is best to make up for it directly to farmers. Don't withdraw the funds for benefiting farmers from Chili noodles again. Farmers buy building materials, which brings great opportunities to building materials suppliers. Why should we subsidize them?

Passenger transport to the countryside is also the embodiment of urban-rural integration. In the past, passenger transport in many places only went to towns and villages, so it was a big problem for farmers to travel. If the passenger really goes to the countryside and solves the problem of farmers' difficulty in traveling, farmers don't have to move to the town.

7. if the cooperative has good news, it can start a rural mutual fund cooperative?

The document stipulates: support qualified cooperatives to set up rural mutual funds cooperatives.

This year's No.1 document has a lot of good news for cooperatives, as well as various preferential policies. Many projects have proposed to tilt towards cooperatives. For example, new agricultural subsidies are appropriately tilted to large grain growers and farmers' professional cooperatives; Continue to support the construction of modern circulation network project in the new countryside of supply and marketing cooperatives; Vigorously develop farmers' professional cooperatives, further promote the construction of demonstration cooperatives, and subsidize cooperatives with strong service capabilities and good democratic management; Loan guarantee companies supported by governments at all levels should include farmers' professional cooperatives in the scope of services and support qualified cooperatives to set up rural mutual funds cooperatives; Support farmers' professional cooperatives to set up their own agricultural products processing enterprises; Support the development of forest farmers' professional cooperatives; Accelerate the implementation of relevant policies to promote the reform and development of supply and marketing cooperatives; Expand the coverage of grass-roots party organizations to new rural organizations, and promote the practice of establishing party organizations in areas where farmers' professional cooperatives, professional associations, migrant workers and businessmen are relatively concentrated, and so on.

In my opinion, among all the regulations on cooperatives, the biggest progress should be to support qualified cooperatives to develop rural mutual funds cooperatives in the above policies. This is one of the biggest breakthroughs in the history of cooperation development so far. Cooperatives have laid a good foundation for faster growth in the future through mutual funds and financing.

8. The practice of centralized residents tampering with farmers' homestead to avoid the red line of policy should be restrained.

The document stipulates that rural land consolidation should be carried out in an orderly manner, the increase and decrease of urban and rural construction land should be strictly limited within the pilot scope, the turnover index should be incorporated into the annual land use plan for unified management, and the land saved after the consolidation of rural homesteads and villages should still be owned by farmers collectively, so as to ensure that the total scale of urban and rural construction land will not be broken, ensure the quality of reclaimed farmland and safeguard farmers' interests.

In the past, in many places, farmers' homesteads were replaced by centralized living, and then the land was used to develop industries. Farmers didn't get much benefit, but local governments and developers gained a lot, which brought great public grievances. This time, Document No.1 specifically pointed out that these lands will still be collectively owned by farmers and cannot be lightly used for industrial development. Only it should be further stipulated that if we really want to develop industry, we should let farmers take shares and share out dividends.

9. There will be subsidies for agricultural loans, and the Agricultural Bank will have great development in the county?

Document No.1 stipulates: implement and improve policies such as tax incentives, targeted cost subsidies and incremental incentives for agricultural loans; Further improve the policy that new deposits absorbed by banking financial institutions in the county are mainly used for local loans; Establish agricultural industry development fund; Rural insurance is also subsidized.

In recent years, rural finance has not been solved for the simple reason that farmers and residents are scattered and poor. How can big banks stand dealing with scattered small farmers? There is a serious shortage of manpower. Mainly there is no discount. This time it is real money, and the loan for benefiting farmers gives preferential interest. I wonder if the above subsidies can attract financial giants to borrow more money from farmers? Of course, there is still a long way to go to completely solve the problem of farmers' financial services.

10. If you donate it to the rural public welfare fund, will the enterprise have a big discount?

According to the document, if the donation expenditure of enterprises for the construction of rural public welfare projects through public welfare social organizations, people's governments at or above the county level and their departments, or the establishment of special rural public welfare foundations does not exceed the total annual profit 12%, it is allowed to be deducted before calculating the enterprise income tax.

In the past, let enterprises donate money to the countryside, in one word: difficult! It's not that I don't want to donate, it's that the policy is not in place. Why are American entrepreneurs charitable? Why are the Chinese rich in Hong Kong willing to donate? They are all institutional incentives. Well done. Therefore, this year's No.1 document also began to give incentives to the system. This is like real money. Is it necessary to set off a wave of donations from China to the countryside? We really have to wait and see.

1 1. The chaotic merger of rural primary schools should be curbed, and the tragedy of school buildings collapsing and crushing students will not be repeated?

The document stipulates that the layout of rural schools should be realistic, convenient for students to go to school and ensure students' safety. Continue to implement the safety project of primary and secondary school buildings. Gradually improve the nutritional status of rural students in poor areas.

It has been eight years since the merger of rural primary and secondary schools, which has exposed too many problems. It's time to stop. Nominally, merging schools means that rural primary and middle school students can enjoy high-quality educational resources, but in fact, after the implementation of tuition-free compulsory education, the financial pressure can be alleviated through the merger of schools. Doing so actually ruined rural education. Because students have to go a long way to school at an early age, it brings too much inconvenience to students and families. Some students even take a slow head for a week at a time, and finally they all break down and have to eat. Because of the lack of many farmers, according to a long-term observation by a professor at Stanford, the students in these merged primary schools generally have malnutrition problems. Therefore, it is necessary to facilitate the safety of students and students, and they cannot be merged at will.

12. In the future, rural cadres will be replaced if they don't do well, and it is no longer a dream for farmers to be civil servants.

The document stipulates: strengthen the management of the leading bodies of township party organizations and timely adjust the weak and lax rural grassroots party organizations. Promote the recruitment of township civil servants and the selection of township leading cadres from outstanding village cadres.

After years of rural research, I found that the development of a village has a great relationship with the village branch secretary. When the secretary is strong, the village will develop. The secretary is very weak, and this village is generally difficult to develop. On the one hand, there are a large number of good secretaries like Wu from Huaxi Village and Yong Lian Village, and there are also a number of village secretaries who do nothing but do things indiscriminately. This year's document stipulates that it is timely to replace those weak and lax village cadres.

In addition, outstanding village cadres can work as civil servants in villages and towns, which is also a good news to implement the policy of letting farmers work as civil servants proposed by the Ministry of Personnel.

13. Beware of religious chaos in rural areas.

The document stipulates: to prevent and stop using religion, clan and other forces to interfere in rural public affairs.

In recent years, there has been a "religious craze" in rural areas of China. In many rural areas of China, various religious activities are rapidly expanding and "reviving". Take Christianity as an example. In addition to the 20 million religious believers counted by the official religious department of the state, there are also many hundreds of millions of believers. The Economist (2008) quoted Pew's survey and estimated that there are 654.38 million+300 million Christians of all kinds. Religious development is closely related to public goods and services. Even in extreme cases, villagers' meetings in some places need church members to mobilize people to attend the meetings. This trend has aroused the high vigilance of the ruling party. In any country, the sudden emergence of a huge group of believers should be highly concerned. This year's Document No.1 hopes that the church will not interfere in rural public affairs, which is a clear signal.

14. There will also be power outages in rural areas.

The document stipulates: carry out activities to create peace in rural areas, adhere to mass prevention and treatment, rely on the masses, strengthen and improve the comprehensive management of rural social security, further promote the construction of rural policing, and severely crack down on evil forces and all kinds of illegal and criminal activities.

Chongqing's crackdown on gangs has attracted applause from the whole country, although there have been some new changes in the Li Zhuang case recently. It has long been common for the evil forces in rural areas to manipulate elections and do evil. Just how to fight has always been a difficult problem, especially how to check the collusion between police and robbers in many areas. Cracking down on gangs in Chongqing, to a certain extent, completely eliminated corrupt elements in public security organs, procuratorial organs and laws, which was taboo in the past. Only in this way can we really crack down on gangs. The rampant evil forces in some rural areas have a lot to do with the inaction or chaos of local public security police.

15. Is it possible to resume "two jobs"?

The document stipulates that farmers are encouraged to voluntarily invest in small water conservancy facilities that directly benefit by means of one-on-one discussion and financial subsidies. Deepen the reform of water conservancy project management system.

The last mile problem of farmland water conservancy facilities in China has not been effectively solved. In the past, the "two jobs" system, which was more effective for farmers in the field, was abolished, making farmland water conservancy a waterless source. "Two jobs" are farmers' "voluntary work" and "accumulation work" during the slack season. In the past, the "two jobs" were used to play a role in ditches, ponds, canals, weirs and other places closely related to rural drought and waterlogging prevention. During the slack season, the farmers in the village put in labor to maintain it. When the rainy season comes, ditches and ponds can be used to store water and canals can drain water. People can pump water when the weather is dry. This system of maintaining rural irrigation and water conservancy construction has been running stably for many years and achieved outstanding results, which has played a great role in the maintenance and improvement of irrigation and water conservancy facilities lacking state and government investment. However, it was cancelled when the agricultural tax was abolished in 2002. After the abolition of the "two jobs" in rural areas, although the burden on farmers has been reduced, it is also a double-edged sword, and the investment in rural infrastructure construction is obviously insufficient. From this point of view, it has "increased the burden". So up to now, many irrigation facilities around farmers' villages have become unattended for children without mothers, and the country only cares about rivers. Farmers can't help it, or some places secretly insist on two jobs, or they have some money or have the means to ask for money from it, so they use wells to irrigate it.

This document is to be passed item by item, and advocates encouraging farmers to voluntarily invest their labor and carry out the construction of small water conservancy facilities that directly benefit. That's a good idea. Just one thing, one thing and one discussion, has become a phenomenon that no one can talk about anything in many rural areas, which is worth pondering.

16. Farmers' employment and entrepreneurship have also been paying attention to the implementation of free labor preparation training for new rural laborers?

The document stipulates: strive to promote farmers' employment and entrepreneurship. Establish a public employment service system covering urban and rural areas, actively carry out agricultural production technology and skills training for migrant workers, integrate training resources, standardize training work, and enhance farmers' scientific farming and employment and entrepreneurship capabilities. Gradually implement free labor preparation training for new rural labor force. We will implement the policy of giving priority to public schools, supplemented by the introduction of quotas, solve the enrollment problem of migrant workers' children, and care for left-behind children in rural areas.

The No.1 Document No.27 specifically lists the issue of farmers' employment and entrepreneurship, which shows the importance of this issue. In the past, farmers' employment and entrepreneurship were their own business. Putting it on the government's agenda this time shows that the central government has made it clear that many labor-intensive industries that solve the employment of migrant workers cannot be demonized lightly, and farmers' jobs cannot be lightly smashed under the pretext of developing high-tech industries. Farmers can also get corresponding training in employment? Gradually implement free labor preparation training for new rural labor force.

The other is the enrollment of migrant workers' children, which is directly related to the growth of flowers in the motherland. Although these children are children of migrant workers, their poor growth will directly affect the future development of the country. If we build a school for migrant workers now, we may have to build more prisons in the future. In some places, out of selfish departmentalism, the children of migrant workers have always been regarded as a big burden, and it is evil to take various hidden means to prevent their children from entering school smoothly. This time, Document No.1 reiterated that it is necessary to solve the enrollment problem of migrant workers' children mainly by introducing quotas. Should the principal or director of education be dismissed for refusing to implement or pretending to implement it? I hope there should be such a regulation, and it is time to make such a regulation. Even the Prime Minister has said this problem many times, but there are still so many problems that have not been solved. These people are so incompetent.

17. State-owned forest farms need not open their eyes!

The document stipulates: start the reform of state-owned forest farms and support the infrastructure construction of state-owned forest farms. Carry out the reform of the management system of state-owned forest areas and the pilot project of unified management of state-owned forest resources.

I used to see that the reform of collective forest was well done, and the state-owned forest farm was worried to death. This time, there is no need. The document stipulates that the reform of state-owned forest farms should be initiated. It's just that state-owned forest farms are hard to return. If we really want to change, we will have an experience in Hunchun, Heilongjiang now. There are still too many problems to be clarified whether it can be promoted nationwide.

18. Is the village-level debt going to be dissolved?

The document stipulates that: according to the relevant planning and requirements, the central and provincial finance will continue to support the settlement of historical debts of rural compulsory education, promote the pilot settlement of other public welfare rural debts, and prevent new rural debts.

Village debt used to be an ordinary fried egg, and I never dared to touch it. This seems to be a move. The document stipulates that the central and provincial governments will support the clearing and resolution of historical debts of rural compulsory education and promote other public welfare rural debts. It seems a bit of a play to solve the public welfare fund debt, but the problem is that smart township cadres should take this as a basket and put everything in it.

19. establish and improve the monitoring and early warning mechanism for the import and export of agricultural products and agricultural materials.

The document stipulates: strengthen the regulation of agricultural products import and export, implement flexible and efficient agricultural products import and export policies, establish and improve the monitoring and early warning mechanism of agricultural products and agricultural materials import and export, severely crack down on illegal and criminal acts of agricultural products smuggling, and effectively strengthen the supervision of agricultural products import and export quality.

When Japan and South Korea import a little American beef, they will generally set off a huge political struggle in their own countries, including demonstrations. To some extent, they are also for the American government. You see, it's not that I don't allow it, but that domestic public opinion doesn't allow it. In recent years, Taiwan Province Province of China has also faced enormous political pressure, including various demonstrations and sit-ins. Looking back at the gate of China, it seems that few people guard it. There are many chaotic phenomena in the import of agricultural products in China. For example, the excessive import of a huge amount of soybeans has caused great harm to our soybean farmers. The bean processing enterprises have basically changed their surnames, and the whole industry has basically been dragged down by excessive imports. Another example is the indiscriminate import of fruits, which also hurts fruit farmers in China. If we don't protect them, these industries may be brought down. There are many other industries that have such problems. From the perspective of national industrial security, it is really necessary to focus on monitoring and early warning of such phenomena. If the agricultural industry is put down too much, the pricing power of domestic agricultural products will be handed over to others. At that time, it will not only be passive, but also the huge social instability brought about by the ups and downs of prices.

20. The project of home appliances going to the countryside should take a little woman's step.

The document stipulates that household appliances, automobiles and motorcycles should be implemented. It is necessary to intensify the efforts to go to the countryside, substantially increase the maximum price of home appliances to the countryside, continue to implement the subsidy standard of 13% for products within the current price limit, and implement fixed subsidies for products beyond the price limit, allowing provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) to re-select 1 variety according to local conditions, and expand the subsidy target to employees of state-owned agricultural and forestry farms (regions).

For home appliances going to the countryside, I still have only two suggestions: issue vouchers for home appliances to farmers and change the bidding to GSP. We must change the current strange phenomenon of supplementing the rich without supplementing the poor, so that poor farmers in rural areas, not just the rich in rural areas, can also enjoy household appliances. There seems to be too much work to do.