Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Why is Yu a shameless scholar?

Why is Yu a shameless scholar?

I like Yu's article very much. I have read several of his books, and I admire his noble character between the lines. But inevitably, Master Yu was criticized in some aspects. Here are some examples of his criticism that I found myself:

One: fraudulent donation. In May 2009, the editor of Jinghua Literature published a blog post, questioning Yu's claim that he had donated 200,000 yuan to the disaster area. Subsequently, Yi Zhongtian questioned Yu in three blog posts, saying that public figures should not cheat on donations. At this point, I fell into the "fraudulent donation door." After the donation was not implemented, it was forced by public pressure to donate books worth 200 thousand;

Secondly, plagiarism. The article "How I Copied with the Achievements of the Old Professor Fudan" on page 266 of the book "I Phenomenon" points out that there is a paragraph of more than 400 words in the book that is exactly the same as the article of the old professor Fudan;

Third, the article is full of loopholes, and people question many mistakes such as misuse of grammar and historical materials;

Fourth, he is dishonest. He used to be a member of the "Eleventh Brother" group under the leadership of the "Four Gang", and he is still unwilling to admit what he did in the "Eleventh Brother" group. It is reported that Southern Weekend threatened the editor of Southern Weekend with suicide when it disclosed some bad things I had done (according to reliable sources);

Of course, there are also many negative news about Yu, such as "bad words", "a slip of the tongue in the youth song contest" and "tearful persuasion in the earthquake" and so on.

I found all the above by myself. If you are interested, you can go and see for yourself.

Let me say a few more words about this. What we see and hear is one-sided. I sigh at all the places where the master has been criticized. No matter what the truth is, what we appreciate and admire is his article. For others, different people have different views. Why use all kinds of strange eyes to deny a person's achievements?